Table 3.
The comparison results of the normalized prediction N-RMSE values among different studies
| Approaches | HNM (Zhang et al., 2022b) | SVR (Zhang et al., 2022a) | FFNN (Zhang et al., 2022a) |
|---|---|---|---|
| N-RMSE [%] | 9.48 1.51 |
8.49 2.74 |
10.13 3.44 |
![]() |
0.91 0.04 |
0.93 0.05 |
0.89 0.08 |
| Approaches | CNN–ROI1 | CNN–ROI2 | CNN–ROI3 |
| N-RMSE [%] | 8.97 1.33 |
7.34 1.09 |
6.91 0.95 |
![]() |
0.89 0.03 |
0.93 0.03 |
0.94 0.02 |
Note. Reported data are the mean ± standard deviation across conditions and participants, where previous studies applied data fusion between sEMG and US imaging signals.
Abbreviation: HNM, hill-type neuromuscular mode; SVR, support vector regression; FFNN, feedforward neural network.













