Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 6;3:e20. doi: 10.1017/wtc.2022.18

Table 3.

The comparison results of the normalized prediction N-RMSE values among different studies

Approaches HNM (Zhang et al., 2022b) SVR (Zhang et al., 2022a) FFNN (Zhang et al., 2022a)
N-RMSE [%] 9.48 Inline graphic 1.51 8.49 Inline graphic 2.74 10.13 Inline graphic 3.44
Inline graphic 0.91 Inline graphic 0.04 0.93 Inline graphic 0.05 0.89 Inline graphic 0.08
Approaches CNN–ROI1 CNN–ROI2 CNN–ROI3
N-RMSE [%] 8.97 Inline graphic 1.33 7.34 Inline graphic 1.09 6.91 Inline graphic 0.95
Inline graphic 0.89 Inline graphic 0.03 0.93 Inline graphic 0.03 0.94 Inline graphic 0.02

Note. Reported data are the mean ± standard deviation across conditions and participants, where previous studies applied data fusion between sEMG and US imaging signals.

Abbreviation: HNM, hill-type neuromuscular mode; SVR, support vector regression; FFNN, feedforward neural network.