Table 2.
External reviewer quality grading (1 = lowest, 10 = highest) and ranking (1–12) of usability evaluation protocols (n = 24)
| Use Case 1 (n = 12) | Use Case 2 (n = 12) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | Quality rating | Condition | Experience score | Quality rating | Condition | Experience score |
| 1 | 10 | +IUT | 1 | 8 | +IUT | 48 |
| 2 | 9 | −IUT | 45 | 8 | −IUT | 49 |
| 3 | 9 | +IUT | 6 | 7 | +IUT | 64 |
| 4 | 8 | +IUT | 72 | 7 | −IUT | 48 |
| 5 | 8 | +IUT | 2 | 7 | −IUT | 64 |
| 6 | 8 | +IUT | 80 | 5 | −IUT | 2 |
| 7 | 7 | −IUT | 48 | 5 | +IUT | 15 |
| 8 | 6 | −IUT | 9 | 4 | +IUT | 32 |
| 9 | 6 | −IUT | 18 | 3 | −IUT | 25 |
| 10 | 5 | +IUT | 16 | 3 | +IUT | 81 |
| 11 | 3 | −IUT | 20 | 3 | −IUT | 40 |
| 12 | 2 | −IUT | 36 | 2 | +IUT | 36 |