Table 4.
Analysis of evaluation protocol composition (n = 24)
| Use Case 1 (n = 12) | Use Case 2 (n = 12) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −IUT (n = 6) | +IUT (n = 6) | −IUT (n = 6) | +IUT (n = 6) | |
| Evaluation items | ||||
| Total # of items | 34 | 43 | 41 | 53 |
| Average # of items per protocol | 5.67 | 7.17 | 6.83 | 8.83 |
| # of individual items | 16 | 20 | 20 | 25 |
| Method type | ||||
| Quantitative item | 74% | 47% | 76% | 79% |
| Qualitative items | 26% | 53% | 24% | 21% |
| Ratio | 2.78 | 0.87 | 3.10 | 3.82 |
| Standardization | ||||
| Non-standardized items | 88% | 88% | 76% | 62% |
| Standardized items | 12% | 12% | 24% | 38% |
| Ratio | 7.50 | 7.60 | 3.10 | 1.65 |
| Data type | ||||
| Objective items | 56% | 33% | 51% | 42% |
| Subjective items | 44% | 67% | 49% | 58% |
| Ratio | 1.27 | 0.48 | 1.05 | 0.71 |