Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 19;32:e49. doi: 10.1017/awf.2023.45

Table 4.

Mean (± SD) dB Change from baseline (T0) at T1 and T2, by treatment and frequency band

Frequency band Treatment T1 (<25 s post stun application) T2 (26-50 s post stun application)
Alpha
P1–400 Hz (n = 29) 3.11 (± 3.80)B 0.73 (± 1.84)AB
P1–50 Hz (n = 31) 3.61 (± 4.28)AB 1.37 (± 2.76)A
P2–400 Hz (n = 30) 2.29 (± 2.69)B 0.91 (± 1.25)B
P2–400 Hz (n = 29) 1.81 (± 3.33)A 0.56 (± 2.00)AB
Beta
P1–400 Hz (n = 29) 3.66 (± 3.15)AB 1.09 (± 1.61)AB
P1–50 Hz (n = 31) 3.61 (± 3.21)A 1.05 (± 1.85)A
P2–400 Hz (n = 30) 5.24 (± 2.88)B 1.87 (± 1.57)B
P2–400 Hz (n = 29) 5.25 (± 2.71)AB 1.92 (± 1.86)A
Theta
P1–400 Hz (n = 29) 5.57 (± 5.71)AB 1.80 (± 4.01)AB
P1–50 Hz (n = 31) 7.59 (± 5.32)AB 3.31 (± 4.02)B
P2–400 Hz (n = 30) 8.48 (± 4.74)B 2.86 (± 3.40)B
P2–400 Hz (n = 29) 6.92 (± 5.08)A 1.46 (± 4.20)A
Delta
P1–400 Hz (n = 29) 9.33 (± 8.00)AB 4.72 (± 6.21)
P1–50 Hz (n = 31) 13.04 (± 6.61)B 6.83 (± 5.55)
P2–400 Hz (n = 30) 12.00 (± 6.14)AB 5.98 (± 6.29)
P2–400 Hz (n = 29) 11.22 (± 7.46)A 3.93 (± 7.41)

A, B, C: within frequency bands, means within columns with different superscript differ significantly (P < 0.05, Kolmogorov-Smirnov post hoc analysis).