Table 2.

Performance analysis of Diinamic-R and Diinamic-V against scenarios 2–10 from Nieves et al.⁽²³⁾, simulating multiple blinking of fluorophores.

	ARI (mean ± SD)		IoU (mean ± SD)
Multiple blinking scenario #	Diinamic-R	Diinamic-V	Diinamic-R	Diinamic-V
2	0.91 ± 0.07	0.91 ± 0.08	0.75 ± 0.06	0.57 ± 0.09
3	0.92 ± 0.07	0.94 ± 0.06	0.64 ± 0.08	0.61 ± 0.05
4	0.91 ± 0.08	0.91 ± 0.07	0.39 ± 0.07	0.36 ± 0.06
5	0.65 ± 0.07	0.61 ± 0.06	0.70 ± 0.04	0.79 ± 0.02
6	0.71 ± 0.10	0.73 ± 0.11	0.85 ± 0.03	0.82 ± 0.02
7	0.74 ± 0.12	0.67 ± 0.13	0.65 ± 0.07	0.66 ± 0.04
8	0.92 ± 0.07	0.88 ± 0.09	0.65 ± 0.05	0.66 ± 0.04
9	0.60 ± 0.15	0.63 ± 0.15	0.84 ± 0.03	0.79 ± 0.03
10	0.91 ± 0.06	0.92 ± 0.06	0.78 ± 0.06	0.68 ± 0.04

Note. Results were scored using ARI and IoU scores using the same optimized parameters for all the simulations (n = 50) from each scenario.