Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 12;10(1):e003839. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003839

Table 3.

Logistic regression for VAS pain score of ≤10 and ≤20 mm at week 24: multivariable analysis with pairwise comparison

Baseline parameter Pairwise comparison VAS pain score ≤10 mm VAS pain score ≤20 mm
OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value
Age, years 1 unit increase 0.99 (0.99 to 1.00) 0.016
Anti-CCP or RF positive Yes vs no 1.46 (1.14 to 1.88) 0.003 1.35 (1.09 to 1.67) 0.007
BMI, kg/m2 1 unit increase 0.98 (0.96 to 0.99) 0.009 0.98 (0.96 to 0.99) 0.002
CDAI 1 unit increase 1.03 (0.97 to 1.10) 0.283 1.04 (0.99 to 1.10) 0.145
Concurrent oral corticosteroids Yes vs no 0.79 (0.66 to 0.95) 0.014 0.78 (0.66 to 0.92) 0.003
DAS28-CRP 1 unit increase 1.54 (1.06 to 2.24) 0.024 1.69 (1.20 to 2.37) 0.002
Duration of RA, years 1 unit increase 0.98 (0.97 to 0.99) 0.007 0.99 (0.98 to 1.00) 0.100
Ethnicity Hispanic/Latino vs not Hispanic/Latino 1.04 (0.68 to 1.59) 0.851 0.79 (0.54 to 1.16) 0.233
FACIT-Fatigue 1 unit increase 0.99 (0.98 to 1.01) 0.497 1.00 (0.99 to 1.01) 0.914
HAQ-DI 1 unit increase 0.95 (0.75 to 1.19) 0.629 1.07 (0.87 to 1.31) 0.528
Pain VAS score, mm 1 unit increase 1.00 (0.99 to 1.00) 0.340 1.00 (0.99 to 1.01) 0.511
Patient global VAS score, mm 1 unit increase 0.99 (0.98 to 1.00) 0.170 0.99 (0.98 to 1.00) 0.014
Physician global VAS score, mm 1 unit increase 1.00 (0.99 to 1.00) 0.635
Race Asian vs White 0.95 (0.55 to 1.64) 0.865 1.15 (0.57 to 2.34) 0.701
Black/African American vs White 0.95 (0.55 to 1.64) 0.848 0.67 (0.40 to 1.11) 0.117
Other vs White 1.13 (0.75 to 1.70) 0.548 0.99 (0.67 to 1.46) 0.970
Region Asia+Southeast Asia vs North America 0.70 (0.30 to 1.59) 0.390 0.69 (0.33 to 1.47) 0.337
Eastern Europe vs North America 0.84 (0.61 to 1.16) 0.287 0.92 (0.69 to 1.23) 0.569
South/Central America vs North America 1.62 (1.00 to 2.61) 0.050 1.88 (1.21 to 2.94) 0.005
Western Europe+Other vs North America 0.99 (0.69 to 1.42) 0.971 0.86 (0.62 to 1.20) 0.385
SDAI 1 unit increase 0.97 (0.91 to 1.04) 0.381 0.95 (0.89 to 1.01) 0.078
SF-36 MCS 1 unit increase 1.03 (1.02 to 1.04) <0.001 1.03 (1.01 to 1.04) <0.001
SF-36 PCS 1 unit increase 1.05 (1.03 to 1.07) <0.001 1.04 (1.03 to 1.06) <0.001
Sex Female vs male 0.90 (0.72 to 1.14) 0.383
Smoking status Current vs never 1.22 (0.93 to 1.59) 0.148 1.15 (0.91 to 1.46) 0.237
Former vs never 1.72 (1.32 to 2.24) <0.001 1.63 (1.28 to 2.08) <0.001
TJC28 1 unit increase 0.93 (0.89 to 0.96) <0.001 0.95 (0.91 to 0.98) 0.002
Treatment Adalimumab vs placebo 1.90 (1.30 to 2.79) <0.001 1.81 (1.33 to 2.48) <0.001
FIL100 vs placebo 2.38 (1.74 to 3.24) <0.001 2.04 (1.59 to 2.62) <0.001
FIL200 vs placebo 3.18 (2.34 to 4.32) <0.001 2.78 (2.16 to 3.56) <0.001

The model included treatment group, study, baseline VAS pain score and all of the additional predictors shown.

Anti-CCP, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide; BMI, Body Mass Index; CDAI, Clinical Disease Activity Index; DAS28-CRP, Disease Activity Score-28 with C-reactive protein; FACIT-Fatigue, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index; MCS, Mental Component Summary score; PCS, Physical Component Summary score; RF, rheumatoid factor; SDAI, Simple Disease Activity Index; SF-36, 36-item short-form health survey; TJC28, tender joint count based on 28 joints; VAS, visual analogue scale.