Skip to main content
. 1998 Jan;72(1):218–224. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.1.218-224.1998

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of study subjects

Couplea Ageb (yr) of:
Reported length of risk period (yr)c Time of load determina- tion (mo)d Virus phenotype at moment of (possible) transmissione No. of virus clones analyzed
NR or R NT or T
D1 26 28 3 6.5 NSI 4
D2 41 43 13 5.9 NSI 5
D3 43 46 4 8.5 NSI 5
D4 24 38 3 2.9 NSI 5
D5 45 53 4 3.0 NSI 5
D6 33 33 7 12.2 NSI 4
D7 34 41 2 6.6 NSI 4
D8 33 40 NK 8.8 NSI 5
D9 40 40 9 3.0 NSI 4
D10 40 34 0.5 3.3 NSI 5
C1 40 49 1 4.3 NSI 5
C2 56 41 0.5 31.1 NSI 3
C3 30 27 1 7.3 NSI 5
C4 34 49 <0.5 4.2 NSI 5
C5 36 28 NK −3.1 NSI 5
C6 37 34 1 21.4 NSI 5
C7 44 30 NK 6.1 SI 5f
C8 28 39 4 2.7 NSI 5
C9 48 32 NK 17.1 NSI 0
C10 31 24 2 3.5 NSI 0
a

D, discordant; C, concordant. 

b

Age of transmitters (T) and recipients (R) at moment of transmission and age of nontransmitters (NT) and nonrecipients (NR) at the end of the risk period. 

c

In concordant couples, the period of unsafe sex until the moment of transmission. NK, not known. 

d

Months after entry for nontransmitters and after the moment of seroconversion of the partner for transmitters. 

e

In nontransmitters, the phenotype of the first time point at which virus clones were successfully grown; in transmitters, the phenotype close to the time point of seroconversion of the partner. 

f

Two NSI and three SI variants were analyzed.