Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 28;482(4):716–723. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002871

Table 2.

Association of dental procedures with pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis

Hazard period Control periodsa ORb (95% CI) p value
Main analysis
 Exposure assessment period, 4 weeksc (n = 3599) 18 (663) 31 (1132) 0.81 (0.72-0.92) < 0.001
Secondary analysisd
 With antibiotic prophylaxis (n = 2737) 9 (250) 15 (410) 1.11 (0.93-1.32) 0.26
 Without antibiotic prophylaxis (n = 3264) 14 (448) 27 (889) 0.72 (0.63-0.83) < 0.001
Sensitivity analysis
 Exposure assessment period, 8 weekse (n = 3222) 28 (909) 44 (1412) 0.81 (0.73-0.91) < 0.001
 Exposure assessment period, 12 weeksf (n = 2826) 34 (973) 53 (1492) 0.74 (0.66-0.84) < 0.001
 Invasive dental proceduresg (n = 1856) 4 (78) 8 (153) 0.94 (0.71-1.25) 0.67
 Noninvasive dental proceduresg (n = 3407) 19 (634) 32 (1099) 0.80 (0.71-0.90) < 0.001

Data are presented as % (n) unless noted otherwise.

a

Patients who underwent a dental procedure in at least one control period.

b

OR of exposure to dental procedures in the hazard period compared with the two control periods within the same individuals.

c

Hazard period was 1 to 4 weeks and two control periods were 9 to 12 weeks and 17 to 20 weeks before the index date.

d

Categorizing the exposure depending on use of antibiotic prophylaxis.

e

Hazard period was 1 to 8 weeks and two control periods were 17 to 24 weeks and 33 to 40 weeks before the index date.

f

Hazard period was 1 to 12 weeks and two control periods were 25 to 36 weeks and 49 to 60 weeks before the index date.

g

Classifying the exposure according to whether the dental procedure was invasive or nonivasive.