Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Jan 28.
Published in final edited form as: BMJ Mil Health. 2025 Jan 28;171(1):33–39. doi: 10.1136/military-2023-002535

Table 4.

Primary and secondary feasibility outcomes

Outcome Value
Session Adherence (attended ≥ 80% sessions), n (%)
All (n=21) 15 (72%)
Finishers (n=14) 12 (86%)
Detailed Attendance, median [IQR]
Individual Sessions (n=21) 100% [90%, 100%]
Coaching Sessions (n=20*) 94% [81%, 100%]
Group Sessions (n=17^) 78% [67%, 90%]
Technology Adherence (responded ≥ 80% of texts), n (%)
All participants (n=20), All 2-way Texts 11 (55%)
Finishers (n=14), All 2-way Texts 10 (71.4%)
Detailed Text Response Rates, median [IQR]
All participants (n=20), response to steps only (1×/day) 84% [62%, 98%]
All participants (n=20), response to falls only (1×/week) 85% [66%, 100%]
Finishers (n=14), response to steps only (1×/day) 93% [76%, 99%]
Finishers (n=14), response to falls only (1×/week) 88% [83%, 100%]
Technology Enrollment, n (%)
Annie 20 (95.2%)
Sync My Health Data 15 (71.4%)
Participant Surveys (n=15), mean (SD)
Feasibility of Intervention Measure 4.5 (1.0)
Intervention Appropriateness Measure 4.4 (1.0)
V-signals (satisfaction) 4.8 (0.4)
Provider Surveys (n=3), mean (SD)
Feasibility of Intervention Measure 3.9 (0.3)
Intervention Appropriateness Measure 4.7 (0.5)
*

Only 20 are included in coaching attendance because 1 individual completed coaching sessions integrated into individual sessions

^

4 individuals are missing from the group session adherence because they withdrew prior to starting group sessions