Table 2.
One-way analysis of executive function status of Tibetan children and adolescents with different soybean product consumption.
| Executive function | Soy consumption | N | M | SD | F-value | p-values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consistent reaction time | ≤1 t/w | 257 | 790.63 | 97.40 | 5.293 | 0.005 |
| 2–5 t/w | 595 | 775.91 | 83.09 | |||
| ≥6 t/w | 332 | 767.68 | 79.44 | |||
| Inconsistent reaction time | ≤1 t/w | 257 | 811.16 | 97.40 | 5.563 | 0.004 |
| 2–5 t/w | 595 | 796.59 | 83.23 | |||
| ≥6 t/w | 332 | 787.55 | 79.28 | |||
| Inhibit function reaction time | ≤1 t/w | 257 | 20.53 | 5.92 | 1.954 | 0.142 |
| 2–5 t/w | 595 | 20.69 | 6.17 | |||
| ≥6 t/w | 332 | 19.87 | 6.17 | |||
| 1back reaction time | ≤1 t/w | 257 | 997.74 | 314.59 | 1.404 | 0.246 |
| 2–5 t/w | 595 | 975.69 | 310.37 | |||
| ≥6 t/w | 332 | 954.26 | 317.61 | |||
| 2back reaction time | ≤1 t/w | 257 | 1178.82 | 319.45 | 6.374 | 0.002 |
| 2–5 t/w | 595 | 1091.11 | 369.70 | |||
| ≥6 t/w | 332 | 1086.20 | 357.80 | |||
| Switching reaction time | ≤1 t/w | 257 | 1178.99 | 265.26 | 8.536 | <0.001 |
| 2–5 t/w | 595 | 1135.23 | 247.70 | |||
| ≥6 t/w | 332 | 1094.04 | 234.53 | |||
| Size parity reaction time | ≤1 t/w | 257 | 758.48 | 114.80 | 0.940 | 0.391 |
| 2–5 t/w | 595 | 751.74 | 113.43 | |||
| ≥6 t/w | 332 | 745.21 | 124.38 | |||
| Conversion function reaction time | ≤1 t/w | 257 | 420.51 | 235.11 | 8.129 | <0.001 |
| 2–5 t/w | 595 | 383.49 | 218.32 | |||
| ≥6 t/w | 332 | 348.83 | 189.22 |
Soy Consumption, Hardly ever ≤ 1 time/week, Occasionally 2–5 time/week, Often ≥ 6 time/week. Each calculation uses 1 standard cup of soy milk about 200 g; 1 Standard bowl of bean curd about 200 g calculation; One serving of soy products is calculated as 200 g. Descriptive statistics are presented as mean (standard deviation) for continuous and categorical.N, number; M, mean; SD, standard deviation.