Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 29;15:1355969. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1355969

Table 4.

Total effects of subjective norms, diet-related identity, perceived status of meat consumption, environmental identity, and environmental concern on sustainable diet intentions for men and women in the UK, China, Sweden and Brazil.

Men Women
B (SE) ß 95% CI B (SE) ß 95% CI
Subjective norms Sustainable diet intentions
UK −0.111 (0.139) −0.121 −0.330, 0.168 −0.101 (0.067) −0.095 −0.212, 0.045
China −0.085 (0.360) −0.027 −0.528, 0.284 0.209 (0.407) 0.140 −0.228, 0.528
Sweden 0.686 (0.675) 0.419* 0.093, 2.692 −0.154 (0.279) −0.086 −0.393, 0.210
Brazil 0.138 (0.252) 0.094 −0.152, 0.625 −0.228 (0.101) −0.222* −0.469, −0.056
Diet-related identitySustainable diet intentions
UK −0.686 (0.052) −0.837* −0.924, −0.757 −0.607 (0.036) −0.811* −0.873, −0.743
China −1.195 (0.318) −0.873* −1.339, −0.612 −0.871 (0.250) −0.716* −1.031, −0.463
Sweden −1.068 (0.321) −0.989* −2.029, −0.784 −0.761 (0.068) −0.854* −0.955, −0.759
Brazil −1.095 (0.240) −0.810* −1.090, −0.627 −0.722 (0.078) −0.734* −0.840, −0.631
Perceived status of meat consumption Sustainable diet intentions
UK 0.354 (0.192) 0.272* 0.027, 0.572 0.301 (0.080) 0.247* 0.129, 0.382
China 0.978 (0.152) 0.745* 0.550, 0.957 1.125 (0.322) 0.629* 0.421, 0.920
Sweden 1.419 (1.244) 0.663* 0.277, 3.385 −0.025 (0.386) −0.011 −0.320, 0.278
Brazil 0.749 (0.410) 0.461* 0.137, 1.029 −0.244 (0.170) −0.144 −0.403, 0.034
Environmental identity Sustainable diet intentions
UK −0.024 (0.046) −0.023 −0.123, 0.068 0.100 (0.042) 0.097* 0.022, 0.182
China 0.325 (0.141) 0.163* 0.040, 0.317 0.444 (0.191) 0.186* 0.047, 0.383
Sweden 0.026 (0.146) 0.036 −0.308, 0.199 0.164 (0.074) 0.119* 0.011, 0.216
Brazil 0.223 (0.115) 0.180* 0.031, 0.339 0.271 (0.070) 0.221* 0.127, 0.336
Environmental concern Sustainable diet intentions
UK 0.137 (0.044) 0.143* 0.052, 0.229 0.071 (0.045) 0.065 −0.021,0.138
China 0.016 (0.116) 0.009 −0.126, 0.120 0.063 (0.112) 0.033 −0.091, 0.160
Sweden 0.038 (0.154) 0.033 −0.183, 0.237 0.018 (0.068) 0.015 −0.095, 0.116
Brazil −0.180 (0.108) −0.104 −0.235, 0.002 −0.068 (0.110) −0.031 −0.133, 0.053

*p < 0.05. Results based off analyses with 1,000 bootstrap samples.