Table 3.
Average assessed proportion of impact results of each EPC
| Participant code | EPC:2 | EPC:6a | EPC:17 | EPC:32a | EPC:39 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LA label | HCD label | LA label | HCD label | ||||
| EG1_1 | 1.0 | 0.9| | 0.3 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.9 |
| EG1_2 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| EG1_3 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.0 |
| EG1_4 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.9 |
| EG2_1 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.9 |
| EG2_2 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| EG2_3 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.0 |
| EG2_4 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.9 |
| The average assessed proportion of the impact | 0.9 | 0.82 | 0.22 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.3 | 0.9 |
aThese EPCs show the difference between the values assigned by the participants for the LA and HCD labels