Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 29;80(4):575–588. doi: 10.1007/s00228-024-03619-3

Table 4.

HEART calculations of AHEP—label design assessed as the EPC 6

Generic task type = G Nominal human error probability = 0.002
EPC HEART effect multiplier The assessed proportion of impact Assessed EPC effect
2. A shortage of time available for error detection & correction 11 0.9 ((11–1) × 0.9) + 1 = 10
17. Little or no independent checking or testing of output 3 0.86 ((3–1) × 0.86) + 1 = 2.7
39. Distraction/Task Interruption 4 0.9 ((4–1) × 0.9) + 1 = 3.7
6. A mismatch between an operator’s model of the world and that of a designer 8

0.8 (LA label)

0.22 (HCD label)

((8–1) × 0.8) + 1 = 6.6

((8–1) × 0.23) + 1 = 2.5

Total assessed EPC effect LA label  = (10 × 2.7 x × 3.7 × 6.6) = 664.22
HCD label  = (10 × 2.7 × 3.7 × 2.5) = 255.63
Assessed human error probability

LA label = (0.002) × 664.22 = 1.33*

HCD label = (0.002) × 255.63 = 0.51