Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 13;42(1):151. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04874-w

Table 2.

Predictors for treatment success for MET alone in SS post-SWL

Variable Treatment success N = 40 Treatment failure N = 105 P value Multivariate analysis OR (95%CI) P value
Age in years (mean ± SD)a 44.1 ± 11.2 46.6 ± 12.8 0.1
Gender (no. of pts)b
 Male 30(75) 79 (75.2) 0.9
 Female 10(25) 26 (24.8)
Obesity (no. of pts)b
 Non-obese 22 (55) 50 (47.6) 0.4
 Obese 18 (45) 55 (52.4)
Presence of ureteral stent (no. of pts)b
 No 39 (97.5) 94 (89.5) 0.2
 Yes 1 (2.5) 11 (10.5)
Time to clearance in weeks (mean ± SD)a 2.5 ± 1.2 3.9 ± 1.1 0.1
Site of stones (no. of pts)b
 Pelvic 19 (47.5) 56 (53.3) 0.7
 Iliac 5 (12.5) 14 (13.3)
 Lumbar 16 (40) 35 (33.3)
Type of steinstrasse (no. of pts)b
 Type I 31 (77.5) 73 (69.5) 0.6
 Type II 7 (17.5) 24 (22.9)
 Type III 2(5) 8 (7.6)
Stone size (no. of pts)b
  ≤ 10 mm 38 (95) 76 (72.4) 0.003 7.85 (1.3–14.5) 0.02
  > 10 mm 2 (5) 29 (27.6)
Ureteral wall thickness (median & range)c 2 (1–3) 3 (1–7) 0.001 3.95 (1.6–11.92) 0.01
Hounsfield unit of the stones (mean ± SD)a 745 ± 284.6 853 ± 290 0.9

Bold values mean statistically significance

No. of pts number of patients

aIndependent sampled t test

bChi-square test

cMann–Whitney test