Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 28;13(2):307–320. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-23-691

Table 7. Univariate and multivariate analyses of TTF according to clinical and treatment characteristics (n=92).

Characteristics Patients, n (%) mTTF (months) Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
EGFR mutation subtype, n (%)
   Exon 19 deletion 55 (59.8) 10.5
   Exon 21 L858R point mutation 23 (25.0) 13.9 1.21 (0.72–2.06) 0.471 1.22 (0.72–2.06) 0.464
   Resistant mutations 1 (1.1) 12.4 0.93 (0.12–7.26) 0.946 0.89 (0.12–6.82) 0.910
   Rare and complex mutation 13 (14.1) 6.6 0.70 (0.36–1.37) 0.301 0.71 (0.37–1.38) 0.312
Baseline symptomatic brain metastases, n (%)
   No 56 (60.9) 10.0
   Yes 36 (39.1) 11.2 0.91 (0.56–1.47) 0.701 0.91 (0.56–1.47) 0.701
ECOG performance status, n (%)
   0–1 15 (16.3) 14.0
   2–4 77 (83.7) 11.1 2.30 (1.22–4.36) 0.010 1.75 (0.97–3.16) 0.062
Tumor stage, n (%)
   IVB 38 (41.3) 7.9
   IVA 51 (55.4) 12.3 0.86 (0.53–1.40) 0.543 0.76 (0.49–1.18) 0.219
   IIIC 3 (3.3) 4.7 4.84 (1.35–17.37) 0.015 3.37 (1.00–11.34) 0.050
Comorbidities, n (%)
   No 59 (64.1) 11.2
   Yes 33 (35.9) 10.9 1.39 (0.86–2.25) 0.174 1.3 (0.85–2.09) 0.214
Afatinib starting dose, n (%)
   40 mg once daily 29 (31.5) 9.8
   Less than 40 mg once daily 63 (68.5) 12.5 0.62 (0.38–1.02) 0.062 0.76 (0.49–1.20) 0.238
Afatinib dose adjustment, n (%)
   No 67 (72.8) 11.1
   Yes 25 (27.2) 11.2 0.77 (0.47–1.26) 0.301 0.77 (0.48–1.26) 0.307

, number and percentage of subgroup of patients who failed treatment with afatinib; , the first group was the reference category in logistic regression analysis. mTTF, median time to treatment failure; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.