Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 17;18(2):348–357. doi: 10.5009/gnl230019

Table 2.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between the Endoscopic Gallbladder Drainage Conversion and Conservative Treatment Groups

EIPC conversion
group (n=63)
Conservative treatment
group (n=175)
p-value
30-day recurred acute cholecystitis 1 (1.59) 2 (1.14) 0.604
30-day acute cholangitis requiring ERCP 0 0 >0.999
30-day unplanned readmission due to gallstone-related diseases 1 (1.59) 2 (1.14) 0.604
Overall recurred acute cholecystitis 3 (4.76) 31 (17.71) 0.012
Overall acute cholangitis requiring ERCP 5 (7.94) 18 (10.29) 0.588
Overall unplanned readmission due to gallstone-related diseases 6 (9.52) 40 (22.86) 0.022
Re-intervention for acute cholecystitis 3 (4.76) 31 (17.71) 0.012

EIPC, endoscopic internalization of percutaneous cholecystostomy; ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.