Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 14;14(12):8303–8312. doi: 10.1039/d4ra00247d

Comparison with other methods reported in the literature for the determination of QNsa.

Method Adsorbent Sample (numbers of QNs) Extraction time (min) Linearity Recovery (%) LOD Ref.
MSPE-HPLC-MS/MS Fe3O4@COF(TpBD)@Au-MPS Pork, chicken and bovine (6) 30 0.005–0.500 mg L−1 94.23–98.6 0.002–0.004 mg kg−1 42
MSPE-HPLC-DAD Fe3O4@COFs Milk, pork and human plasma (6) 60 2.5–1500 ng g−1 78.7–103.5 0.25–0.5 ng g−1 43
MSPE-LC-FLD Fe3O4@PLS Milk (3) 20 0.4–600 μg kg−1 96.5–118.6 0.41–0.45 μg L−1 58
RAM-MIPs-DSPE-HPLC-UV RAM-MIPs Milk and river water (5) 20 and 15 5–200 μg L−1 80.7–103.5 1.02–3.15 μg L−1 59
85.1–105.9 0.93–2.87 μg L−1
SPE-LC-MS/MS Oasis HLB SPE cartridges Aquaculture wastewater (17) >25 0.5–100 μg L−1 47.8–118.7 0.08–0.3 ng L−1 60
MSPE-RPLC-MS/MS PEI-functionalized Fe3O4/ATP Chicken muscle (3) 20 0.2–100 μg kg−1 83.9–98.7 0.02–0.08 μg L−1 41
MSPE-UPLC-MS/MS Fe3O4@SiO2@Ah-COF Water and egg samples (24) 20 0.2–200 μg kg−1 70.3–106.1 0.003–0.036 μg L−1 This work
70.4–119.7 0.009–0.272 μg kg−1
a

DAD: diode-array detector, FLD: fluorescence detection, RAM-MIPs: restricted access media-MIPs, RPLC: reversed-phase liquid chromatography.