Table 2.
The impact of DIP payment reform on different levels of medical institutions based on ITSA
| Hospital-Level | Variables | Baseline slope β1 (95%CI) | Step change β2 (95%CI) | Slope change β3 (95%CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tertiary | PRCP | -0.139 (-0.196, -0.082)*** | 0.832 (-0.072, 1.736) | 0.197 (0.094, 0.300)*** |
| CMI | -0.009 (-0.013, -0.006)*** | 0.071 (0.013, 0.128)* | 0.022 (0.016, 0.029)*** | |
| PPC | 0.123 (0.038, 0.208)** | -0.097 (-1.208, 1.014) | -0.290 (-0.392, -0.188)*** | |
| PC | 0.209 (-0.146, 0.564) | 2.216 (-2.205, 6.637) | -0.786 (-1.207, -0.366)** | |
| NPC | 0.278 (0.057, 0.498)* | -1.059 (-4.005, 1.888) | -0.509 (-0.873, -0.144)** | |
| Secondary | PRCP | 0.030 (-0.054. 0.114) | 0.291 (-0.874, 1.456) | 0.132 (0.022, 0.242)* |
| CMI | -0.004 (-0.005, -0.002)*** | 0.037 (0.015, 0.059)** | 0.008 (0.006, 0.010)*** | |
| PPC | -0.010 (-0.190, 0.169) | 6.940 (3.684, 10.196)*** | -1.200 (-1.533, -0.878)*** | |
| PC | -0.935 (-1.349, -0.521)*** | 14.982 (9.819, 20.144)*** | 0.257 (-0.330, 0.843) | |
| NPC | 0.042 (-0.180, 0.264) | -4.058 (-7.343, -0.773)* | 0.672 (0.379, 0.966)*** | |
| Primary | PRCP | -0.026 (-0.104, 0.051) | -1.676 (-2.736, -0.615)** | 0.186 (0.078, 0.294)** |
| CMI | -0.001 (-0.002, -0.001)*** | 0.019 (0.009, 0.028)*** | 0.002 (0.001, 0.003)*** | |
| PPC | -0.133 (-0.251, -0.015)* | 3.926 (0.285, 7.568)* | -0.515 (-0.864, -0.166)** | |
| PC | 2.294 (1.545, 3.042)*** | 3.250 (-5.654, 12.155) | -2.011 (-2.892, -1.130)*** | |
| NPC | 0.657 (0.506, 0.809)*** | -0.387 (-2.145, 1.370) | -0.124 (-0.297, 0.049) |
PRCP Proportion of patients receiving complicated procedures, CMI Case mix index, PPC Proportion of primary-DIP-groups cases, PC Primary-DIP-groups coverage, NPC Non-primary-DIP-groups coverage
*
**
***