Table 2.

The analysis process—overview

The analysis process	Authors’ responsibility in the analysis process
The analysis began with several individual open-minded readings of the transcripts to obtain a general understanding of and become immersed in the data	Performed independently by two authors (CA, EKA)
In the next step, the transcripts were abstracted into codes through writing notes and headings in the margins of the transcripts while reading them	Performed independently first by two authors (CA, EKA), who then get together and discussed the codes before compiling them into a coding sheet
The codes were transferred into tables, and grouped according to similarities and differences, with a focus on the aim of this study	The first author (CA) took the lead in the analysis, the last (EKA) acted as co-analyser
Through interpreting similarities and differences, further abstraction was achieved, resulting in six generic categories including sub-categories. As a final step, generic categories were grouped and once more reduced to a main category representing the abstracted results	The first author (CA) took the lead in the analysis, the last (EKA) acted as co-analyser
Finally, the other authors (BN, AS) validated the analysis by reading the transcripts and taking an active part in discussing the interpretation of the findings	All authors (CA, BN, AS, EKA)