Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 14;17:61. doi: 10.1186/s13048-024-01384-6

Table 2.

Prognostic analysis of 12 candidate LNM-related genes in ovarian cancer

Gene OS PFS
HRa ( 95%CIb) P HRa ( 95%CIb) P
TUBA4B 0.84 (0.74, 0.96) 0.010 0.88 (0.78, 1.01) 0.062
SPP1 1.31 (1.16, 1.50)  < 0.001 1.38 (1.21, 1.57)  < 0.001
RGS1 0.93 (0.82, 1.06) 0.010 1.25 (1.09, 1.42)  < 0.001
VTCN1 1.12 (0.97, 1.30) 0.130 1.15 (0.99, 1.33) 0.066
TMPRSS4 0.83 (0.73, 0.95) 0.006 0.83 (0.73, 0.95) 0.008
EPHX4 0.85 (0.69, 1.05) 0.130 1.31 (1.05, 1.65) 0.019
RUNX3 0.83 (0.72, 0.97) 0.019 0.94 (0.82, 1.09) 0.430
MUC16 0.83 (0.73, 0.95) 0.005 1.21 (1.05, 1.41) 0.010
SPON1 0.83 (0.73, 0.94) 0.005 0.91 (0.79, 1.05) 0.210
PCDHB2 1.31 (1.07, 1.62) 0.010 1.49 (1.21, 1.84)  < 0.001
MEOX1 1.16 (1.02, 1.32) 0.021 1.21 (1.06, 1.38) 0.005
SLC4A11 0.79 (0.64, 0.97) 0.024 1.36 (1.11, 1.68) 0.003

aHazard Ratio; > 1 represents a poor prognostic factor, and < 1 represents a good prognostic factor

bCondifence Interval