Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 14.
Published in final edited form as: Dermatol Surg. 2019 Jul;45(7):908–930. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001925

Table 8.

Reports of radiofrequency treatment of varicose veins

Author Publication Year Evidence Study Design (Sample Size) Condition Intervention Number of Treatments/Intervals Outcome Measures Clinical Outcomes Patient Reported Outcomes Adverse events
Dunn et al. 2006 (45) 2 Prospective nonrandomized (n = 68; 85 extremities) Incompetent GSV Endovenous radiofrequency ablation (ERA) w/tumescent anesthesia and sedation 1 session Duplex ultrasound (DUS) Occlusion Occlusion rate:
96% at 3 days
90% at 6 months

Overall success rate:
88% at 6 months
Not reported At 3 days (n=83):
Ecchymosis 13%
Erythema 13%
Hematoma 2%
Hyperpigmentation 1 pt

At 6 months (n=73):
Hyperpigmentation 3%
Paresthesia 4%
Garcia-Madrid et al. 2013 (46) 3 Prospective nonrandomized (n = 59; 67 extremities) Incompetent GSV ERA w/ tumescent anesthesia 1 session DUS Occlusion Occlusion rate: 100% Not reported Erythema 1 pt
Class 1 heat-induced thrombosis 1 pt
Gibson et al. 2017 (47) 1 Randomized control trial (n = 222) Incompetent GSV Cyanoacrylate closure (CAC) w/o anesthesia

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) w/ tumescent anesthesia
1 session DUS Occlusion

Symptoms
Occlusion rate
At 1 year:
RFA 97.0%
CAC 97.2%

At 2 years:
RFA 94.0%
CAC 95.3%
Patient satisfaction at 2 years:
RFA 75%
CAC 79.1%
At 12–24 months:
Pain (RFA 21%; CAC 30%)
Aching (RFA 34%; CAC 29%)
Heaviness (RFA 14%; CAC 13%)
Swelling (RFA 16%; CAC 16%)
Mallick et al. 2016 (48) 4 Retrospective cohort (RF n = 7,355; total n = 144,098) Incompetent GSV RFA

Sclerotherpy

Laser ablation
1 session Rates of new venous ulcers

Rates of additional interventional treatment

Disease progression
New venous ulcers at 1 year:
RF 2.4%
Sclerotherapy 1.2%
Laser ablation 2.2%

Additional treatment sought at 1 year:
RF 53.3%
Sclerotherapy 63.6%
Laser ablation 66.8%

Disease progression at 2 years:
RF 42.4%
Sclerotherapy 28.6%
Laser ablation 37.8%
None collected Not reported
Mendes de Almeida et al. 2016 (49) 1 Randomized, controlled trial (n = 18) Incompetent GSV ERA in one leg and conventional surgery in the other; both w/ spinal anesthesia 1 session DUS occlusion

Reflux sapheno-femoral junction (SFJ) and GSV
DUS Occlusion:
8/10 (80%) at 12 months

Reflux SFJ:
0/10 (0%) at 12 months

Reflux GSV:
0/15 (0%) at 12 months
Patient satisfaction at 6 months (1–10):
CS 6.93±2.70
RFA 6.86±2.71

Pain at 6 months (1–10):
CS 5.64±3.80
RFA 3.71±3.27
Not reported
Proebstle et al. 2011 and 2015 (57–58) 3 Prospective nonrandomized
(n = 225; 295 extremities)
Incompetent great saphenous vein (GSV) Radiofrequency segmental
thermal ablation (RSTA)
1 session DUS Occlusion

Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS)

Pain (0–10)
DUS Occlusion:
92.6% at 3 years
91.9 % 5 years

Avg VCSS:
Baseline: 3.9 ±2.1
3 years: 0.9 (p=0.05)
5 years: 1.3

Pain:
Baseline 17.3% w/ daily pain
3 years: 1.4% w/ daily pain
5 years: 2% w/ daily pain
None collected 1 Week:
Ecchymosis 5.8%
Paresthesia 3.4%
Pigmentation 2.4%
Erythema 2%

3 years:
Leg hyperpigmentation 1 pt
Persisting paresthesia 1 pt

5 years:
Not reported
Schuller-Petrovic et al. 2016 (50) 4 Retrospective cohort (n = 258; 389 extremities) Incompetent GSV and superficial saphenous vein (SSV) RSTA 1 session DUS Occlusion DUS at 5 years:
78.5% GSV
58% SSV
Not Reported Hypesthesia 1%
Hyperesthesia 2%
Ecchymoses 4%
Phlebitis 4%
Deep vein thrombosis 6%
Spiliopoulos et al. 2015 (51) 4 Prospective case series (n = 60; 74 extremities) Incompetent GSV and SSV ERA w/ tumescent anesthesia 1 session CEAP Classification (C0 clinical best - C6 clinical worst)

VCSS

Revascularization rate
Clinical success:
94.6% improvement
Baseline: 72.9% C2-C3
At 1 year: 12.1% C2-C3

VCSS:
baseline: 6.2±2.6
1 month: 1.3±1.2
1 year: 0.9±1.4
P<0.0001

Revascularization rate
12.1%
Not reported Puncture site infection 1 pt
Transient paresthesia 2 pts
Puncture site scar 2 pts
Skin pigmentation 1 pt
Tolva et al. 2012 (52) 4 Case series (n = 407) Incompetence GSV ERA w/ spinal anesthesia 1 session DUS Occlusion Occlusion rate:
100% at 1 week and 6 month follow ups
Not reported Thrombophlebitis 3 pt
Skin pigmentation 1 pt
Paresthesia 1 pt
Nonocclusive thrombus 1 pt
Tzilinis et al. 2005 (53) 4 (n = 421; 490 extremities) Incompetent GSV and SSV ERA w/ regional or general anesthesia or tumescent anesthesia 1 session DUS Occlusion Occlusion rate (1 year):
87%
Not reported Not reported, except no hospitalizations for procedure-related complications
Vasquez et al. 2007 (54) 3 Prospective cohort (n = 499; 682 extremities) Incompetent GSV ERA w/ tumescent anesthesia 1 session VCSS

Occlusion rate

Symptoms
VCSS:
Baseline 8.8
At 1 year 3.6

Occlusion rate at 1 year:
87.1%

Symptoms:
 Pain reduced from 95.7% to 15.2% (p < 0.0001)
 Edema reduced from 92.4% to 17.0% (p < 0.0001)
 Stasis ulcers healed at rate of 86%
Patient satisfaction: 98% Superficial thrombophlebitis (12%)
Ecchymosis (13.1%)
Erythema (2.5%)
Infection (0.5%)
Paresthesia (0.3%)
Wagner et al. 2004 (55) 4 Retrospective cohort (n = 24; 28 extremities) Incompetent GSV ERA w/ general anesthesia 1 session DUS Occlusion Occlusion rate:
100% at 1 year
Patient satisfaction at 2 years:
94.5%
Worsening of leg swelling: 1 pt
Localized thrombophlebitis: 2 pts.
Acute nonocclusive thrombus extending to the common femoral vein from GSV: 1 pt
Weiss et al. 2015 (56) 4 Retrospective cohort
(n = 934 extremities; ERA n = 398)
Incompetent GSV and SSV ERA w/ tumescent anesthesia

1,320nm ND:YAG w/ tumescent anesthesia

810nm Diode (n = 34)
1 session DUS Occlusion Occlusion at 5 years:
RFA 61.7%
ND:YAG 84.7%
Diode laser 65.7%
(P<0.0001)
Not reported Not reported

w/ = with; pt = patient; q = every (i.e. q2 weeks = every 2 weeks); x = times to repeat (i.e. x3 = repeat 3 times)