Skip to main content
Psychoradiology logoLink to Psychoradiology
. 2023 Sep 8;3:kkad014. doi: 10.1093/psyrad/kkad014

Sex differences of brain cortical structure in major depressive disorder

Jingping Mou 1,2,3,#, Ting Zheng 4,#, Zhiliang Long 5, Lan Mei 6, Yuting Wang 7,8, Yizhi Yuan 9, Xin Guo 10,11, Hongli Yang 12,13, Qiyong Gong 14, Lihua Qiu 15,16,17,
PMCID: PMC10939343  PMID: 38666130

Abstract

Background

Major depressive disorder (MDD) has different clinical presentations in males and females. However, the neuroanatomical mechanisms underlying these sex differences are not fully understood.

Objective

The purpose of present study was to explore the sex differences in brain cortical thickness (CT) and surface area (SA) of MDD and the relationship between these differences and clinical manifestations in different gender.

Methods

High-resolution T1-weighted images were acquired from 61 patients with MDD and 61 healthy controls (36 females and 25 males, both). The sex differences in CT and SA were obtained using the FreeSurfer software and compared between every two groups by post hoc test. Spearman correlation analysis was also performed to explore the relationships between these regions and clinical characteristics.

Results

In male patients with MDD, the CT of the right precentral was thinner compared to female patients, although this did not survive Bonferroni correction. The SA of several regions, including right superior frontal, medial orbitofrontal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus triangle, superior temporal, middle temporal, lateral occipital gyrus, and inferior parietal lobule in female patients with MDD was smaller than that in male patients (P < 0.01 after Bonferroni correction). In female patients, the SA of the right superior temporal (r = 0.438, P = 0.008), middle temporal (r = 0.340, P = 0.043), and lateral occipital gyrus (r = 0.372, P = 0.025) were positively correlated with illness duration.

Conclusion

The current study provides evidence of sex differences in CT and SA in patients with MDD, which may improve our understanding of the sex-specific neuroanatomical changes in the development of MDD.

Keywords: major depressive disorder, gender differences, magnetic resonance imaging, cortical thickness, surface area

Introduction

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a significant threat to people's health, characterized by symptoms such as depression, cognitive impairment, loss of interest, and low energy (Song et al., 2018). It is predicted to become the leading cause of global disease burden by 2030 (Malhi and Mann, 2018). MDD is more common in women, with twice the prevalence compared to men from adolescence to adulthood (Nolen-Hoeksema, 2016). Hormonal changes, such as estrogen and progesterone imbalance in females and low testosterone levels in males, have been implicated in the sex differences in depression (Kundakovic and Rocks, 2022). Additionally, biological, psychological, and social-cultural factors contribute to the sex differences in depression (Hyde and Mezulis, 2020).

Clinical characteristics of MDD differ between males and females. Males with MDD often exhibit severe symptoms such as impulsivity, irritability, and insomnia, while females with MDD are more likely to present with somatic symptoms and atypical depression symptoms including increased appetite, weight gain, fatigue, and difficulty sleeping (Kim et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2017). Females also tend to have a better response to serotonergic antidepressants compared to males (Sramek et al., 2016).

Neuroimaging studies have shown differences in brain activity between female and male patients with MDD. Male patients with MDD exhibit lower amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation values in the left superior/middle frontal gyrus, and higher amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation values in the left postcentral gyrus when compared to female patients (Yao et al., 2014). Structural brain studies have also identified sex differences in gray matter volume (GMV) changes in individuals with MDD (Taki et al., 2005; Yang et al., 2017). GMV is determined by cortical thickness (CT) and surface area (SA), both of which have genetic and phenotypic independence, and reflect the different properties of gray matter structures (Grasby et al., 2020; Winkler et al., 2010). CT reflects the number of cells within a column, while SA reflects the number of cortical columns (Lee et al., 2021). Therefore, CT and SA measurements should be taken into consideration separately and prioritized over GMVs (Hanford et al., 2016; Winkler et al., 2010).

Most studies on sex-specific brain structure alterations in depression have focused on GMV (Kong et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2017), with limited research on CT and SA (Hu et al., 2022; Li et al., 2020). Thus, our study aimed to investigate the sex differences in CT and SA in individuals with MDD and explore the associations between these differences and clinical manifestations in different sexes.

Methods

Participants

This study involved patients diagnosed with MDD obtained from the Department of Psychiatry Clinic, West China Hospital of Sichuan University. All patients underwent a comprehensive interview conducted by two seasoned psychiatrists, following the diagnostic criteria for MDD as per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV). Additionally, their mental condition was assessed using the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, HAMD-17). We included only those patients who were in depressive episodes and scored a minimum of 18 on the HAMD-17, had not received any antidepressant treatment for at least 1 year preceding the imaging examination, and did not have any other neurological or affective disorders.

We recruited the healthy control (HC) group through poster advertising. All volunteer participants underwent the SCID-I Non-Patient Edition scale to rule out the possibility of neuropsychiatric disorders. The exclusion criteria for all participants were as follows: (i) history of traumatic brain damage; (ii) organic brain lesions, such as brain tumors; (iii) alcohol or drug abuse (as per DSM-IV diagnostic criteria); (iv) pregnancy; and (v) neurological diseases such as epilepsy and multiple sclerosis.

Based on these inclusion and exclusion criteria, we recruited 61 patients with untreated MDD (25 male, 36 female) and 61 healthy volunteers (25 male, 36 female) in the study. An experienced radiologist confirmed the absence of abnormalities on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans for all participants. The Medical Ethics Committee of the Second People's Hospital of Yibin approved this study (no. 2014–056-01), and all participants provided written informed consent.

MRI Data Acquisition

High-resolution anatomical images of the whole brain were obtained using a 3 Tesla MRI system (EXCITE, General Electric), equipped with an eight-channel phased-array head coil. We employed a 3D, sagittal, magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo (MPRAGE) sequence to acquire three-dimensional T1-weighted images. The parameters used were: 156 axial slices; slice thickness, 1 mm; TR, 1900 ms; TE, 2.26 ms; flip angle, 12°; FOV, 240  × 240 mm; and data matrix, 256 × 256. All participants were fitted with foam padding and earplugs, and instructed to remain still during scanning (Yang et al., 2017).

Data Preprocessing

The cortical surface of the 3D T1 image was constructed using the FreeSurfer software (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/, v.5.3.0). This software measures the CT and SA of the entire cortex by automatically performing surface reconstruction, transformation, and high-resolution inter-individual calibration steps (Han et al., 2014; Muschelli et al., 2018). First, the original Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine images for T1-weighted data are converted to the Neuroimaging Informatics Technology Initiative format, then to the MGZ format, and head movement correction is applied. Next, completing the affine transformation from the original volume to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) 305 atlas and carrying out the Talairach coordinate system transformation. Then standardizing the signal strength of the original volume, performing the strength correction, and removing the deviation of the signal strength, and generating the original curved surface and performing automatic local anatomical correction, and expanding the generated cortical image and converting it to the spherical distribution template. The images were then smoothed using a 25-mm, full-width at half-maximum Gaussian kernel. The results from the automatic image processing for each subject were checked manually to assess whether the brain surface reconstruction was consistent with the grey matter boundary. If inconsistent, manual editing is performed. We obtained CT by calculating the shortest distance from the gray/white boundary to the gray/cerebrospinal fluid boundary at each vertex. The SA of each hemisphere is calculated by adding up the area of all tessellations on the gray matter surface (Deng et al., 2019; Qiu et al., 2014; Xiao et al., 2023).

Statistical Analysis

We compared demographic and clinical data across the four groups (male MDD, female MDD, male HC, and female HC) using SPSS (v.25.0). Age and education years among groups were compared using a two-way analysis of covariance. The illness duration and HAMD score in male and female groups with MDD did not exhibit normal distributions and were analyzed as non-parametric using the Mann–Whitney U-test. CT and SA among the four groups were analyzed using a two-way analysis of covariance, taking sex (male, female) and diagnosis (MDD, HC) as between-participant factors, and intracranial volume as a covariate in MATLAB. The statistical results were adjusted using Bonferroni correction with a significance level of P < 0.01. We identified brain regions with sex differences in CT and SA among the four groups, which were then compared using a post hoc test (Student–Newman–Keuls method) between every two groups. The results were corrected using Bonferroni correction. The statistical threshold was set at P < 0.05. Spearman correlation analysis was performed to investigate the correlation of brain regions with sex differences in MDD and their clinical characteristics (illness duration, HAMD score), with the statistical significance threshold set at P < 0.05.

Results

Participants' Demographic and Clinical Characteristics

Participants' demographic and clinical characteristics are presented in Table 1. No significant differences were observed between the four groups in terms of age or years of education (P > 0.05). Similarly, there was no significant difference in HAMD score between male and female patients with MDD (P > 0.05). However, male patients with MDD had a longer illness duration than female patients (P < 0.05).

Table 1:

Participants' demographic and clinical characteristics (Inline graphic ± s).

Male MDD (n = 25) Female MDD (n = 36) Male HC (n = 25) Female HC (n = 36) P value
Age (years) 36.36 ± 12.79 36.08 ± 10.72 34.88 ± 11.89 36.61 ± 11.83 0.95
Education year (years) 8.8 ± 3.2 8.6 ± 2.6 9.1 ± 3.1 8.3 ± 2.1 0.746
HAMD score 22.32 ± 4.63 23.89 ± 4.45 0.099b
Illness duration (weeks) 101.24 ± 98.43 29.14 ± 42.51 <0.001b
a

The P values were obtained by two-way analysis of variance tests.

b

The P values were obtained by Mann–Whitney U-test.

The Main Effect of Sex on CT and SA

The effect of sex on CT was observed in the right precentral gyrus (P < 0.01 after FDR correction), but this was not maintained after applying the Bonferroni correction (a statistical threshold of P < 0.01). Refer to the Supplementary Material for further discussion and descriptions of the results. A significant effect of sex on SA was found in bilateral inferior frontal gyrus triangle, middle temporal, lateral occipital, left postcentral, rostral anterior cingulate, supramarginal gyrus, insula, right superior frontal, medial orbitofrontal, superior temporal gyrus, and inferior parietal lobule (Bonferroni correction, P < 0.01) (Fig. 1). On examining the effect of diagnosis and sex-diagnosis interactions on CT and SA, respectively, no cluster survives Bonferroni correction or FDR correction at a threshold of P < 0.01.

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

The main effect of sex difference on the SA of gray matter among four groups (L, left hemisphere; R, right hemisphere). The numbers on the color bars indicate −log P values. The warm color (red) indicates decreased SA in the female group (female MDD patients and female HCs) compared with the male group (male MDD patients and male HCs).

Post Hoc Comparison Results

Post hoc analysis revealed that the CT of the right precentral gyrus in the male MDD group was thinner than that of the female MDD group (Supplementary Table S1). The SA of the right superior frontal, medial orbitofrontal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus triangle, superior temporal, middle temporal, lateral occipital gyrus, and inferior parietal lobule in the female MDD group was smaller than that of the male MDD group (Table 2). The detailed results of pairwise comparisons of other groups are shown in the Supplementary Material.

Table 2:

Post hoc test results showing the differences in SA in right hemisphere between the male and female MDD groups (mm2, Inline graphic ± s).

Region M F size (mm2) MNI (x, y, z) P value
superior frontal gyrus 0.74 ± 0.13 0.66 ± 0.10 744 7, 50, 30 0.043
medial orbitofrontal gyrus 0.38 ± 0.05 0.35 ± 0.03 147 8, 27, −12 0.006
inferior frontal gyrus triangle 1.00 ± 0.10 0.93 ± 0.08 4268 53, 28, 5 0.021
superior temporal gyrus 0.63 ± 0.09 0.55 ± 0.06 230 59, −29, 8 0.001
middle temporal gyrus 0.70 ± 0.08 0.64 ± 0.06 1865 64, −35, −8 0.017
lateral occipital gyrus 1.00 ± 0.12 0.87 ± 0.10 889 29, −69, −8 <0.001
inferior parietal lobule 0.87 ± 0.18 0.77 ± 0.11 55 46, −59, 31 0.039

x, y, and z are the coordinates of the primary peak locations in the MNI space; M, male MDD group; F, female MDD group. Bonferroni correction; P < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.

Correlation Analysis

In female patients, a positive correlation was found between the SA of the right superior temporal (r = 0.438, P = 0.008, Fig. 2A), middle temporal (r = 0.340, P = 0.043, Fig. 2B), and lateral occipital gyrus (r = 0.372, P = 0.025, Fig. 2C) and illness duration. There were no significant correlations between the SA and HAMD score or illness duration in male patients with MDD.

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

Correlation analysis in female MDD patients. (A) Correlation between the SA of the right superior temporal gyrus and illness duration. (B) Correlation between the SA of the right middle temporal gyrus and illness duration. (C) Correlation between the SA of the right lateral occipital gyrus and illness duration.

Discussion

Our study's findings indicate sex differences in the cortical structure of male and female patients with MDD. This may have implications for the clinical characteristics of depression in males and females. Specifically, we found thinner CT of the right precentral gyrus in males compared to females with MDD, although this difference did not survive Bonferroni's correction. Additionally, the SA of multiple brain regions was larger in males than in females with MDD, particularly in the frontotemporal and parietal cortices. The alterations of SA are more significant than CT, possibly due to the genetic and phenotypic independence of these measures. Our findings indicate that sex differences in CT and SA might be associated with the neurobiological processes underlying the different clinical characteristics of male and female patients with MDD.

Sex Differences in Surface Area

We found significant differences in SA between male and female groups of MDD. These regions primarily involve the default mode network (DMN), frontoparietal network (right inferior frontal gyrus triangle, superior frontal, medial orbitofrontal gyrus, superior temporal, middle temporal gyrus, and inferior parietal lobule), and visual network (right lateral occipital gyrus), which are thought to be essential in the disease process of depression (Yao et al., 2014).

Decreased DMN connection is related to social dysfunction in people with severe depression (Vanderhasselt et al., 2013). The right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC), the superior temporal and middle temporal gyrus are important regions of the DMN, and play a role in rumination, self-referential processing, and emotional appraisal (Song et al., 2022; Yang et al., 2021; Zhou et al., 2020). It was found that GMV and SA decreased in the right VLPFC in patients with MDD, and the reduced GMV of the right VLPFC related to negative emotions such as sorrow, anxiety, and fatigue (Lener et al., 2016). Dysfunction of the temporal lobe cannot suppress the generation of negative emotions by the prefrontal limbic system, which ultimately manifests as persistent negative emotional experiences (Yu et al., 2017). In self-related negative events, patients with depression exhibit lower brain activity in the medial temporal lobe subsystem and increased brain activity in the dorsal medial prefrontal cortex subsystem of the DMN (Wang et al., 2022). In MDD, females pay greater attention to suicide, while males have a higher risk of successful suicide as they are more likely to succeed when committing killing themselves (Cavanagh et al., 2017). Cao et al. found that suicide attempters with MDD have alterations in intra- and inter-network connectivity between the DMN and right frontal-parietal network (Cao et al., 2020). Depressed patients with suicidality had abnormal cortical morphology in some brain regions within the DMN, frontolimbic circuitry, and temporal regions (Li et al., 2021a; Li et al., 2021b). When compared to suicide non-attempters, suicide attempters with MDD had smaller SA in the left superior frontal gyrus and larger SA in the left lateral occipital gyrus (Kang et al., 2020).

The right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and right inferior parietal lobule are acknowledged as important frontoparietal network-related areas and are linked to cognitive control, attention, and decision-making processes (Yao et al., 2014). Reduced functional connectivity (FC) in MDD has been observed between the DLPFC and the other areas of frontoparietal network (Ma et al., 2020; Yun and Kim, 2021). In MDD, antidepressant therapy was significantly associated with DLPFC abnormalities (Nestor et al., 2022; Zhukovsky et al., 2021). As networks implicated in the cognitive regulation of emotion, the frontoparietal network and subcortical regions, including the bilateral fusiform gyrus, are related to the state-dependent reconstruction of emotion regulation networks in individuals with MDD due to antidepressant treatment (Zhao et al., 2021). Males with MDD showed enhanced neural responses to acute psychosocial stress in the DLPFC and right frontoparietal network compared with females (Dong et al., 2022). The ENIGMA MDD Working Group's findings revealed that patients with more severe insomnia in MDD had smaller SA in part areas of the frontoparietal lobe and that only SA was predictive of the severity of insomnia in MDD, whereas GMV and CT had no predictive value (Leerssen et al., 2020). As evidenced by an increasing number of research, MDD-related suicide attempts are linked to the reduced SA and FC of the inferior parietal cortex (Campos et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2015; Li et al., 2022). The sex differences in SA we observed in the DMN and frontal-parietal network in individuals with MDD may associate with the different clinical symptoms (such as insomnia) and suicide risk between male and female patients with MDD.

The right lateral occipital gyrus is a region of the visual network, which is important in facial perception, expression, and emotional processing (Lee et al., 2021; Moreno-Ortega et al., 2019). Increased BOLD responses to sad stimuli in visual cortices may indicate effective antidepressant treatment (Furey et al., 2013; Keedwell et al., 2010; Moreno-Ortega et al., 2019). A recent article about the sex-specific SA and CT characteristics in MDD discovered that the alterations in the SA of the prefrontal cortex and the local gyrification index of the visual cortex were reversed in male and female MDD when compared to gender-matched HCs (Hu et al., 2022). In the visual networks, the occipital gyrus's diminished functional connectivity was connected to impaired visual processing in MDD (Lu et al., 2020). It has been discovered that the abnormal FC in the visual network was associated with the clinical symptoms of MDD (Wu et al., 2023). The alteration of visual cortical excitability was connected to the psychopathological characteristics of MDD (Du et al., 2022).

Correlations with Illness Duration and HAMD Score

In female individuals with MDD, we observed a positive correlation between illness duration and the SA of the right superior temporal, middle temporal, and lateral occipital gyrus. The duration of depression is related to the degree of cognitive impairment (Pabel et al., 2018). MDD has been associated with cortical transcriptomic changes and there are sex differences in the effects of cortical gene expression on brain morphology (Miles et al., 2021). This study suggests that transcriptome-based polygenic score was associated with smaller amygdala volume and lower prefrontal gyrification across sexes in female patients, and related to hypergyrification in temporal and occipital areas in male patients. Another study reported that the decreased GMV in the right temporal gyrus was correlated with longer illness duration, and long-term sick patients had reduced GMV in the right superior and middle temporal gyrus compared to the early course cohort (Jiang et al., 2023). The temporal lobe is crucial for cognitive processing, including language, memory, and object vision processing (Davey et al., 2016). It has been reported that the thinner occipital cortex may be an endophenotype for MDD, and the response time to emotionally disturbing tasks in adolescents with depression was negatively correlated with the activation of the lateral occipital cortex (Colich et al., 2017). Hu et al. found that the higher local gyrification index in the left visual cortex was correlated with higher HAMD score in female patients with MDD, while this correlation was not observed in males with MDD (Hu et al., 2022). They also conducted a correlation analysis between the structural characteristics and the subscales of the HAMD scale, founding that higher local gyrification index in the left visual cortex was correlated with higher somatization score in female patients with MDD. Considering the limited sample size, we did not analyze the correlation between cortical structure with sex differences and the HAMD subscore group. These findings highlight the presence of sex-specific brain structural changes in MDD and provide neuroanatomical mechanisms for gender differences in clinical manifestations in MDD patients. Zacková et al. demonstrated that the reduced volume of the superior temporal gyrus may be related to communication deficits and infrequent participation in socially stimulating activities in MDD (Zacková et al., 2021).

Limitations

Despite the strengths of our study, several limitations should be noted. First, the sample size was relatively small, which limits the further investigation of the relationship between sex-specific cortical changes and specific clinical manifestation. Second, since the incidence rate for women is higher than that of men, the number of included female patients was greater than male patients in our present study, and the imbalance of sample size between men and women may affect the statistical results. Third, the longer illness duration in the male MDD group compared to the female MDD group may have confounded our results, as illness duration has been shown to be associated with brain alterations in MDD. Finally, the study's cross-sectional design precluded us from examining changes in brain structure over time, highlighting the need for longitudinal studies with larger sample sizes.

Conclusion

Overall, our study revealed sex differences in SA in patients with MDD. These findings are instrumental in exploring the sex-specific neuroanatomical mechanisms of clinical manifestations in patients with MDD.

Supplementary Material

kkad014_Supplemental_File

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Sichuan Science and Technology Program (No. 2018JY0666), 58th batch Chinese Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2015M582554), Sichuan Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission (No. 150251), Science and Technology Bureau of Yibin city (No. 2015SF030), Open Project of Sichuan Key Laboratory of Functional and Molecular Imaging (No. SCU-HM-2021001), Project of Health Commission of Yibin city (No. 2020YW085), and Xinglin Scholar Project of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (No. YYZX2020111).

Contributor Information

Jingping Mou, Department of Radiology, the Second People's Hospital of Yibin, Yibin 644000, China; Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China; Department of Radiology, the First People's Hospital of Yibin, Yibin 644000, China.

Ting Zheng, Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.

Zhiliang Long, Sleep and NeuroImaging Center, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.

Lan Mei, Department of Radiology, the Second People's Hospital of Yibin, Yibin 644000, China.

Yuting Wang, Department of Radiology, the Second People's Hospital of Yibin, Yibin 644000, China; Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.

Yizhi Yuan, Department of Radiology, the Second People's Hospital of Yibin, Yibin 644000, China.

Xin Guo, Department of Radiology, the Second People's Hospital of Yibin, Yibin 644000, China; Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.

Hongli Yang, Department of Radiology, the Second People's Hospital of Yibin, Yibin 644000, China; Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.

Qiyong Gong, Huaxi MR Research Center (HMRRC), West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

Lihua Qiu, Department of Radiology, the Second People's Hospital of Yibin, Yibin 644000, China; Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China; Research Center of Neuroimaging big data, the Second People's Hospital of Yibin, Yibin 644000, China.

Author Contributions

Study design: J.M., T.Z., L.Q., L.L., and Q.G. Data collection, analysis, and interpretation: J.M., T.Z., L.M., Z.L., Y.W., Y.Y., X.G., H.Y., and L.Q. Manuscript drafting: J.M., T.Z., and L.M. Critical revision of the manuscript: L.Q. All authors approved the final version to be published.

Conflict of Interests

One of the authors, Q.G., is also the editor-in-chief of Psychoradiology. He was blinded from reviewing or making decisions on the manuscript.

Data Availability

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Campos AI, Thompson PM, Veltman DJet al. (2021) Brain correlates of suicide attempt in 18,925 participants across 18 international cohorts. Biol Psychiatry. 90:243–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cao J, Ai M, Chen Xet al. (2020) Altered resting-state functional network connectivity is associated with suicide attempt in young depressed patients. Psychiatry Res. 285:112713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cavanagh A, Wilson CJ, Kavanagh DJ, Caputi P (2017) Differences in the expression of symptoms in men versus women with depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 25:29–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen Z, Zhang H, Jia Zet al. (2015) Magnetization transfer imaging of suicidal patients with major depressive disorder. Sci Rep. 5:9670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Colich NL, Ho TC, Foland-Ross LCet al. (2017) Hyperactivation in cognitive control and visual attention brain regions during emotional interference in adolescent depression. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2:388–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Davey J, Thompson HE, Hallam Get al. (2016) Exploring the role of the posterior middle temporal gyrus in semantic cognition: integration of anterior temporal lobe with executive processes. Neuroimage. 137:165–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Deng D-M, Chen L-Z, Li Y-Wet al. (2019) Cortical morphologic changes in recent-onset, drug-naïve idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Magn Reson Imaging. 61:137–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dong D, Ironside M, Belleau ELet al. (2022) Sex-specific neural responses to acute psychosocial stress in depression. Transl Psychiatry. 12:2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Du H, Shen X, Du Xet al. (2022) Altered visual cortical excitability is associated with psychopathological symptoms in major depressive disorder. Front. Psychiatry. 13:844434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Furey ML, Drevets WC, Hoffman EMet al. (2013) Potential of pretreatment neural activity in the visual cortex during emotional processing to predict treatment response to scopolamine in major depressive disorder. JAMA Psychiatry. 70:280–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Grasby KL, Jahanshad N, Painter JNet al. (2020) The genetic architecture of the human cerebral cortex. Science. 367:6484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Han K-M, Choi S, Jung Jet al. (2014) Cortical thickness, cortical and subcortical volume, and white matter integrity in patients with their first episode of major depression. J Affect Disord. 155:42–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hanford LC, Nazarov A, Hall GB, Sassi RB (2016) Cortical thickness in bipolar disorder: a systematic review. Bipolar Disord. 18:4–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hu X, Zhang L, Liang Ket al. (2022) Sex-specific alterations of cortical morphometry in treatment-naïve patients with major depressive disorder. Neuropsychopharmacol. 47:2002–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hyde JS, Mezulis AH (2020) Gender differences in depression: biological, affective, cognitive, and sociocultural factors. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 28:4–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jiang J, Li L, Lin Jet al. (2023) A voxel-based meta-analysis comparing medication-naive patients of major depression with treated longer-term ill cases. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 144:104991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kang S-G, Cho S-E, Na K-Set al. (2020) Differences in brain surface area and cortical volume between suicide attempters and non-attempters with major depressive disorder. Psych Res Neuroimaging. 297:111032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Keedwell PA, Drapier D, Surguladze Set al. (2010) Subgenual cingulate and visual cortex responses to sad faces predict clinical outcome during antidepressant treatment for depression. J Affect Disord. 120:120–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kim J-H, Cho MJ, Hong JPet al. (2015) Gender differences in depressive symptom profile: results from nationwide general population surveys in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 30:1659–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kong L, Chen K, Womer Fet al. (2013) Sex differences of gray matter morphology in cortico-limbic-striatal neural system in major depressive disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 47:733–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kundakovic M, Rocks D (2022) Sex hormone fluctuation and increased female risk for depression and anxiety disorders: from clinical evidence to molecular mechanisms. Front Neuroendocrinol. 66:101010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee JS, Kang W, Kang Yet al. (2021) Alterations in the occipital cortex of drug-naïve adults with major depressive disorder: a surface-based analysis of surface area and cortical thickness. Psychiatry Investig. 18:1025–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Leerssen J, Blanken TF, Pozzi Eet al. (2020) Brain structural correlates of insomnia severity in 1053 individuals with major depressive disorder: results from the ENIGMA MDD Working Group. Transl Psychiatry. 10:425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lener MS, Kundu P, Wong Eet al. (2016) Cortical abnormalities and association with symptom dimensions across the depressive spectrum. J Affect Disord. 190:529–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Li H, Zhang H, Yin Let al. (2021a) Altered cortical morphology in major depression disorder patients with suicidality. Psychoradiology. 1:13–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Li Q, Zhao Y, Chen Zet al. (2020) Meta-analysis of cortical thickness abnormalities in medication-free patients with major depressive disorder. Neuropsychopharmacol. 45:703–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Li W, Wang C, Lan Xet al. (2022) Resting-state functional connectivity of the amygdala in major depressive disorder with suicidal ideation. J Psychiatr Res. 153:189–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Li X, Yu R, Huang Qet al. (2021b) Alteration of whole brain ALFF/fALFF and degree centrality in adolescents with depression and suicidal ideation after electroconvulsive therapy: a resting-state fMRI study. Front Hum Neurosci. 15:762343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lu F, Cui Q, Huang Xet al. (2020) Anomalous intrinsic connectivity within and between visual and auditory networks in major depressive disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 100:109889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ma Q, Tang Y, Wang Fet al. (2020) Transdiagnostic dysfunctions in brain modules across patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder: a connectome-based study. Schizophr Bull [J]. 46:699–712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Malhi GS, Mann JJ (2018) Depression. Lancet North Am Ed. 392:2299–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Miles AE, Dos Santos FC, Byrne EMet al. (2021) Transcriptome-based polygenic score links depression-related corticolimbic gene expression changes to sex-specific brain morphology and depression risk. Neuropsychopharmacol. 46:2304–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Moreno-Ortega M, Prudic J, Rowny Set al. (2019) Resting state functional connectivity predictors of treatment response to electroconvulsive therapy in depression. Sci Rep. 9:5071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Muschelli J, Sweeney E, Crainiceanu CM (2018) Freesurfer: connecting the Freesurfer software with R. F1000Res. 7:599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Nestor SM, Mir-Moghtadaei A, Vila-Rodriguez Fet al. (2022) Large-scale structural network change correlates with clinical response to rTMS in depression. Neuropsychopharmacol. 47:1096–105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nolen-Hoeksema S (2016) Gender differences in depression. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 10:173–6. [Google Scholar]
  37. Pabel LD, Hummel T, Weidner K, Croy I (2018) The impact of severity, course and duration of depression on olfactory function. J Affect Disord. 238:194–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Qiu L, Huang X, Zhang Jet al. (2014) Characterization of major depressive disorder using a multiparametric classification approach based on high resolution structural images. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 39:78–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Song T, Han X, Du Let al. (2018) The role of neuroimaging in the diagnosis and treatment of depressive disorder: a recent review. CPD. 24:2515–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Song X, Long J, Wang Cet al. (2022) The inter-relationships of the neural basis of rumination and inhibitory control: neuroimaging-based meta-analyses. Psychoradiology. 2:11–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sramek JJ, Murphy MF, Cutler NR (2016) Sex differences in the psychopharmacological treatment of depression. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 18:447–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Taki Y, Kinomura S, Awata Set al. (2005) Male elderly subthreshold depression patients have smaller volume of medial part of prefrontal cortex and precentral gyrus compared with age-matched normal subjects: a voxel-based morphometry. J Affect Disord. 88:313–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Vanderhasselt M-A, Baeken C, Van Schuerbeek Pet al. (2013) Inter-individual differences in the habitual use of cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression are associated with variations in prefrontal cognitive control for emotional information: an event related fMRI study. Biol Psychol. 92:433–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang X, Li P, Zheng Let al. (2022) The passive recipient: neural correlates of negative self-view in depression. Brain and Behavior. 12:e2477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Winkler AM, Kochunov P, Blangero Jet al. (2010) Cortical thickness or grey matter volume? The importance of selecting the phenotype for imaging genetics studies. Neuroimage. 53:1135–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wu F, Lu Q, Kong Yet al. (2023) A comprehensive overview of the role of visual cortex malfunction in depressive disorders: opportunities and challenges. Neurosci Bull. 39:1426–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Xiao Q, Fu Y, Yi Xet al. (2023) Altered cortical thickness and emotional dysregulation in adolescents with borderline personality disorder. Eur J Psychotraumatology. 14:2163768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Yang H, Chen X, Chen Z-Bet al. (2021) Disrupted intrinsic functional brain topology in patients with major depressive disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 26:7363–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Yang X, Peng Z, Ma Xet al. (2017) Sex differences in the clinical characteristics and brain gray matter volume alterations in unmedicated patients with major depressive disorder. Sci Rep. 7:2515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Yao Z, Yan R, Wei Met al. (2014) Gender differences in brain activity and the relationship between brain activity and differences in prevalence rates between male and female major depressive disorder patients: a resting-state fMRI study. Clin Neurophysiol. 125:2232–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Yu HL, Liu WB, Wang Tet al. (2017) Difference in resting-state fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation between bipolar depression and unipolar depression patients. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 21:1541–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Yun J-Y, Kim Y-K (2021) Graph theory approach for the structural-functional brain connectome of depression. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 111:110401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zacková L, Jáni M, Brázdil Met al. (2021) Cognitive impairment and depression: meta-analysis of structural magnetic resonance imaging studies. NeuroImage: Clinical. 32:102830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhao L, Wang D, Xue S-Wet al. (2021) Antidepressant treatment-induced state-dependent reconfiguration of emotion regulation networks in major depressive disorder. Front. Psychiatry. 12:771147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhou H-X, Chen X, Shen Y-Qet al. (2020) Rumination and the default mode network: meta-analysis of brain imaging studies and implications for depression. Neuroimage. 206:116287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhukovsky P, Anderson JAE, Coughlan G, Mulsant BH, Cipriani A, Voineskos AN (2021). Coordinate-based network mapping of brain structure in major depressive disorder in younger and older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJP. 178: 1119–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

kkad014_Supplemental_File

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Psychoradiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES