Table 3.
The mean results were performed by different classifiers model
| Indicator | AdaBoost | KNN | LR | RF | SVM | BGF-CMAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acc. (%) | 81.36 ± 0.43 | 71.69 ± 0.50 | 76.24 ± 0.45 | 76.17 ± 0.46 | 69.40 ± 0.81 | 82.90 ± 0.27 |
| Sen. (%) | 80.70 ± 0.46 | 70.14 ± 1.18 | 75.73 ± 0.46 | 75.88 ± 1.91 | 66.78 ± 1.00 | 81.96 ± 0.52 |
| Spe. (%) | 82.02 ± 0.46 | 73.24 ± 1.00 | 76.75 ± 0.54 | 76.47 ± 2.57 | 72.01 ± 1.04 | 83.84 ± 0.35 |
| Pre. (%) | 81.77 ± 0.45 | 72.39 ± 0.61 | 76.51 ± 0.49 | 76.38 ± 1.54 | 70.47 ± 0.90 | 83.53 ± 0.28 |
| MCC (%) | 62.72 ± 0.85 | 43.41 ± 1.0 | 52.48 ± 0.90 | 52.39 ± 0.92 | 38.85 ± 1.62 | 65.81 ± 0.52 |
| AUC | 0.8886 ± 0.0024 | 0.7736 ± 0.0045 | 0.8359 ± 0.0037 | 0.8349 ± 0.0048 | 0.7713 ± 0.0061 | 0.9075 ± 0.0016 |