Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 20;102:skae018. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae018

Table 2.

Effect of dietary zinc (Zn) concentration (ppm) and challenge on fecal dry matter (%) on different days (n = 12)1,2

Zn, ppm Control Challenge
1503 1,4003 2,5003 1504 1,400 2,5005 SEM
Day 0 35.6 32.2x 31.5 33.2 26.3y 31.2 2.12
Day 3 22.7 23.7 24.5 25.7 26.0 23.2 2.38
Day 5 20.9x 23.8 20.9 13.2b,y 24.2a 23.9a 2.11
Day 7 23.2 24.3 21.6 20.4 23.7 25.9 2.02
Day 14 23.7 23.8 22.7 25.0 21.5 24.2 1.93

1Reported estimate derived from the interaction model with Zn × challenge × day and the covariate of BW on d 0 and sex.

2 P-values: Zn = 0.88, challenge = 0.52, day < 0.01, challenge × day = 0.29, Zn × challenge = 0.33, Zn × day < 0.01, Zn × challenge × day = 0.05.

3Lower (≤0.04) on d 3, 5, 7, and 14 compared to d 0, with no difference between d 3, 5, 7, and 14.

4Lower (≤0.04) on d 3, 5, 7, and 14 compared to d 0, lower (< 0.01) on d 5 than on d 3, greater (<0.01) on d 14 than on d 5, no difference between d 3, 7, and 14.

5Lower (≤0.04) on d 3, 5, and 14 compared to d 0, no difference between d 3, 5, 7, and 14, and no difference between d 0 and 7.

abIndicate difference (P ≤ 0.05) between dietary Zn concentrations within challenge group and day.

xyIndicate difference (P ≤ 0.05) between challenge groups within dietary Zn concentration and day.

Values are least-square means with the standard error of mean (SEM)