Table 3.
Effect of dietary zinc (Zn) concentration (ppm) and challenge (C) on plasma concentration of acute phase proteins on different days (D; n = 12)1.
| Control | Challenge | P-values | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zn, ppm | 150 | 1,400 | 2,500 | 150 | 1,400 | 2,500 | Zn | C | D | Zn × C | Zn × D | C × D | Zn × C × D |
| CRP, mg/L2 | 0.03 | 0.07 | <0.01 | 0.87 | 0.16 | 0.08 | 0.78 | ||||||
| Day 0 | 5.3p | 4.7 | 4.2op | 6.0p | 8.4 | 5.8op | |||||||
| Day 3 | 16.0o,a | 4.4b | 2.4pq,b | 14.5o,a | 5.7b | 7.0pq,b | |||||||
| Day 5 | 17.8o | 7.5 | 7.8 op |
16.8o | 7.0 | 9.8op | |||||||
| Day 7 | 17.1op | 7.9 | 12.5o | 13.3op | 13.7 | 11.2o | |||||||
| Day 14 | 4.8op,a | 1.9ab | 1.5q,b | 18.1op,a | 8.2ab | 3.7q,b | |||||||
| Haptoglobin, mg/mL3 | 0.40 | 0.57 | <0.01 | 0.25 | 0.36 | 0.99 | 0.08 | ||||||
| Day 0 | 1.68p | 0.93p | 1.41p | 0.97p | 1.42p | 1.66p | |||||||
| Day 3 | 2.89op | 2.01o | 2.55o | 2.07o | 2.57o | 2.85o | |||||||
| Day 5 | 3.08o | 2.38o | 2.31o | 2.53o | 2.44o | 3.13o | |||||||
| Day 7 | 2.67pq | 2.39o | 2.39o | 2.53o | 2.10op | 2.78o | |||||||
| Day 14 | 1.80pq | 1.74op | 1.72op | 2.39o | 1.90op | 2.47p | |||||||
| Pig-MAP, g/L4 | 0.32 | 0.27 | <0.01 | 0.93 | 0.98 | 0.18 | 0.17 | ||||||
| Day 0 | 0.94p | 0.73p | 0.76p | 0.83p | 0.79p | 0.80p | |||||||
| Day 5 | 1.04o | 0.97o | 0.84o | 1.29o | 0.91o | 0.16o | |||||||
| Day 7 | 0.97o | 0.92o | 0.90o | 1.35o | 1.05o | 1.12o | |||||||
1Reported estimate derived from the interaction models with Zn × C × D and the covariates of BW on d 0 and sex.
2Comparisons derived from the model with C × D, D, C, and Zn as fixed effects.
3Comparisons derived from the model with Zn × C × D as fixed effects.
4Comparisons derived from the model with D as fixed effect.
opqIndicate difference (P ≤ 0.05) within the column (comparison between the days within group).
abIndicate difference (P ≤ 0.05) between Zn concentrations (150, 1,400, and 2,500 ppm) within challenge group.
Data are represented as back-transformed means. To increase the readability of this table the 95% confidence intervals can be seen in Supplementary Table S1.