Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 26;10:56. [Version 1] doi: 10.15694/mep.2021.000056.1

Table 2: Median frequency of access to learning objects by students in each campus (with inter-quartile range).

Campus 1 Campus 2 Campus 3 Kruskal-Wallis
Topic Med (IQR) Med (IQR) Med (IQR) p-value
Topic 1 a 6 (6) 4 (5) 7 (7) < 0.001
Topic 2 2 (2) 2 (1) 3 (2) 0.279
Topic 3 b 8 (17) 6 (11) 36 (45) < 0.001
Topic 4 a 4 (3) 2 (3) 4 (4) 0.027
Topic 5 8 (7) 5.5 (6.5) 8 (9) 0.106
Topic 6 b 6.5 (6.5) 4 (5) 9 (8) 0.012
Topic 7 5.5 (5) 6 (5) 6.5 (6) 0.536
Topic 8 8.5 (6) 8 (9) 8 (16) 0.765
Topic 9 2 (0) 2 (1) 2 (1) 0.819
Topic 10 a 6 (6) 4 (6) 7.5 (7.5) 0.044
Topic 11 a 1 (3) 1 (1) 3 (1) 0.012
Topic 12 5 (4) 8 (5) 8 (9) 0.086
Topic 13 4 (4) 4 (3) 6 (5) 0.491
Topic 14 6 (5) 4.5 (6) 6 (12) 0.310
Topic 15 2 (3) 4 (3) 4.5 (8.5) 0.055
*Topic 16 b 7.5 (8) 5.5 (5) 13 (18.5) <0.001
Topic 17 b 3 (2) 4 (2) 9 (7.5) <0.001
Topic 18 a 15 (14) 5.5 (4.5) 17 (19) 0.010
Topic 19 b 5 (12) 2 (6) 11 (18) <0.001
Topic 20 9.5 (14.5) 4 (4) 10 (25) 0.382
*Topic 21 b 3 (4) 4 (4) 12 (13) <0.001
*Topic 22 b 6 (5) 4 (2) 9 (8) 0.005
*Topic 23 b 3 (3) 4 (2.5) 10 (10) <0.001
Topic 24 a 4 (1) 4 (1) 7.5 (5) 0.073
Topic 25 a 4 (13) 3 (1) 11 (15) 0.010
*Topic 26 b 5 (4) 4 (2) 7 (7) 0.005
a

Indicates topics where access was significantly more frequent at Campus 3 than either Campus 1 or Campus 2.

b

Indicates topics where access was significantly more frequent at Campus 3 than at both other campuses.

*

Recommended Topics for students at Campus 3.