Table 5: Perception of examiners and examinees regarding congruence, feasibility, acceptability and educational impact of OSCE.
| Percentage of strongly agree and agree
( N:10) |
Percentage of strongly agree and agree
(N:28) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Examiners (%) | Examinees (%) | |
| Congruency | ||
| The task can assess the competencies | 100 | 92,8 |
| Feasibility | ||
| Adequate briefing before examination | 100 | 89,2 |
| Time allocated for completing the stations was sufficient | 90 | 89,2 |
| Instructions for examinee is clear | 100 | 100 |
| Well Organized OSCE | 100 | 100 |
| Acceptability | ||
| OSCE is appropriate to assess the clinical competence | 100 | 92,8 |
| Educational Impact | ||
| The application the OSCE Change the way examinees study | 100 | 89,2 |
| OSCE stimulates examines to learn clinical competencies | 100 | 100 |
| OSCE is less stressful than other kind of test | 90 | 85,7 |
| The OSCE evaluates the abilities and skill acquired. | 100 | 100 |
| More objective assessment | 100 | 92,8 |
| OSCE implementation encourages better teaching | 90 | 85,7 |