Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 5;75:103703. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103703

Table 2.

MBC clinical and histological characteristics.

Study
Year
Clinical presentation Mean tumor size (cm T stage (TNM)
(n)
Tumor histology (n) Tumor grade (n Lymphovascular invasion (n Positive ER (n)- Positive PR (n) Positive Her2 (n Ki67 > 20% (n
Albo
2003
Mass (85.7 %)
Nipple discharge (14.3 %)
1.9 (0.5–3.8) T1 to T2 IDC (7) Grade 2 (5)
Grade 3 (2)
7 (100.0 %) 1 (14.3 %) 3 (42.9 %)
Cimmino
2004
Mass (83.3 %)
Nipple discharge (16.7 %)
1.6 (0.7–2.8) T1 to T2 IDC (4)
IPC (1)
DCIS (1)
Grade 1 (1)
Grade 2 (3)
Grade 3 (1)
2 (33.3 %) 4 (66.7 %)
De Cicco
2004
Tis (2)
T1 (10)
T2 (3)
IDC (11)
IPC (5)
DCIS (2)
Grade 1 (1)
Grade 2 (9)
Grade 3 (2)
18 (100.0 %) 12 (66.7 %) 7 (38.9 %)
Gentilini
2007
T1 (23)
T2 (3)
IDC (23)
IPC (3)
DCIS (3)
Other (3)
Grade 1 (11)
Grade 2/3 (21)
31 (96.9 %) 25 (78.1 %) 5 (15.6 %) 17 (53.1 %)
Golshan
2007
Mass (83.3 %) 1.7 (0.8–3.0) IDC (6) Grade 2 (4)
Grade 3 (2)
6 (100.0 %) 5 (83.3 %) 2 (33.3 %)
Goyal
2004
T1 (4)
T2 (5)
IDC (9) Grade 1 (1)
Grade 2 (8)
Koukouras
2012
IDC (10)
Mucoepidermoid (1)
Martin
2017
2.2 (5–40) T1 to T2 IDC (12)
IPC (2)
DCIS (1)
Grade 1 (2)
Grade 2 (12)
Grade 3 (1)
15 (100.0 %) 15 (100.0 %) 2 (13.3 %) 2 (13.3 %)
Port
2001
Mass (83.3 %)
Nipple discharge (6.3 %)
1.3 (0.1–1.3) T1 to T2 IDC (14)
IPC (1)
DCIS (1)
Grade 1 (0)
Grade 2 (6)
Grade 3 (5)
5 (31.3 %) 15 (93.8 %)
Rusby
2006
Mass (83.0 %) 1.8 (0.1–4) T1 (19)
T2 (12)
IDC (28)
ILC (1) IDC/ILC (1) Mucinous (1)
Grade 1 (2)
Grade 2 (18)
Grade 3 (11)
29 (93.5 %) 28 (90.3 %) 5 (16.1 %) 17 (54.8 %)
Simsek
2018
Suehiro
2015
Mass (100.0 %) 1.7 (1.0–2.5) IDC (3) Grade 1 (2)
Grade 3 (2)
3 (100.0 %) 3 (100.0 %) 0 (0.0 %) 1 (33.3 %)

IDC: Invasive Ductal Carcinoma; ILC: Invasive Lobular Carcinoma; IP: Intracystic Papillary Carcinoma; DCIS: Ductal Carcinoma in Situ; ER: Estrogen Receptor; PR: Progesterone Receptor; -: data not available.