Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 1;5:1315763. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1315763

Table 1.

Characteristics of included papers (n = 22).

Author and year Country Study design/study period Timing of HTN measurement Study setting/data source Source population/HDP HTN definition criteria Sample size(n) Effect measures
Amougou et al. (57) Cameroon Retrospective cohort 2009–2016 8 years Records review PE Unclear 136 Persistent HTN 32/136 (23.5%)
Babah et al. (48) Nigeria Prospective cohort 2009 6 weeks Labour wards GH/PE ACOG 29 Persistent HTN 3/29 (10.3%)
Cho et al. (58) Korea Retrospective cohort 2004–2012 8 years Records review PE ISSHP 1,910 Persistent HTN 148/1,910 (7.7%)
Fadalallah et al. (15) Sudan Prospective cohort 2014 6 weeks ANC PE ISSHP 165 Persistent HTN 58/165 (35.2%)
Tornes et al. (66) Cuba Prospective cohort 2017–2020 1 year Labour wards PE ACOG 162 Persistent HTN 45/162 (27.8%)
Ishaku et al. (35) Nigeria Prospective cohort 2017–2018 9 weeks, 6 months and 1 year ANC/Labour wards GH/PE/EC ISSHP 278 persistent HTN; GH = 64/278, 23% (9 weeks), 62/278, 22.3% (6 months), 62/278, 22.3% (12 months)
PE/EC = 170/278, 62% (9 weeks), 170/278, 62% (6 months) and 173/278, 61.2% (12 months)
Kaze et al. (14) Cameroon Prospective cohort 2010–2012 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months ANC/Maternity unit PE/EC ISSHP 54 Persistent HTN 23/54, 42.6% (6 weeks), 15/54, 27.8% (3 months) 8/54, 14.8% (6 months)
Keepanasseril et al. (50) India Prospective cohort 2018–2019 3 months Records review PE ACOG 32 Persistent HTN 32 (18.1%)
Lugobe et al. (64) Uganda Prospective cohort 2019 3 months Labour ward PE/EC/GH Unclear 111 Persistent HTN 21/54 (39%)
Ma and Yao (51) China Prospective cohort 2014–2015 6 weeks ANC PE ISSHP 173 Persistent HTN 61/173 (35.3%)
Mooij et al. (62) Tanzania Cross-sectional 2011–2018 7 years Records review PE ISSHP 24 Persistent HTN 7/24 (29%)
Muteke et al. (65) Uganda 2017–2018 6 weeks Prospective cohort PE ACOG 85 Persistent HTN 5/73 (6.9%)
Nakimuli et al. (56) Uganda Prospective cohort 2009–2011 3 months ANC/labour/postnatal ward PE/EC ISSHP 188 Persistent HTN 64/188 (34%)
Ndayambagye et al. (52) Uganda Prospective cohort 2008–2009 6 weeks Labour/postnatal clinics PE/EC ISSHP 195 Persistent HTN 44/195 (27.7%)
Nganou-Gnindjio et al. (63) Cameroon Cross-sectional 2011–2016 6 months Records review PE/EC Unclear 92 Persistent HTN 30/92 (32.6%)
Ntlemo et al. (55) South Africa Prospective cohort 2019–2020 6 weeks ANC/labour wards PE ISSHP 150 Persistent HTN 49/150 (32.7%)
Olagbuji et al. (53) Nigeria Prospective cohort 2009–2010 6 weeks Prenatal GH/PE/EC ISSHP 198 Persistent HTN 51/198 (25.8%)
Osoti et al. (54) Kenya Prospective cohort 2016–2018 6 months ANC/labour wards GH/PE ISSHP 63 Persistent HTN 28/63 (44.4%)
Shahbazian et al. (59) Iran Retrospective cohort 2001–2003 5 years Records review PE ISSHP 35 Persistent HTN 10/35 (28.6%)
Shammas (60) Jordan Retrospective cohort 1988–1998 10 years Records review PE/GH Unclear 101 Persistent HTN 11/47 (23%) for PE, 21/54 (39%) for GH
Sukmanee et al. (16) Thailand Nested cross-sectional 2014–2020 7 years Records review PE ISSHP 88 Persistent HTN 28/88 (31.8%)
Wang et al. (61) China Retrospective cohort 2014–2020 2 years Records review PE/GH/EC ESH-ESC 1,261 Persistent HTN 94/1,261 (7.5%)

PE, preeclampsia; GH, Gestational hypertension; EC, Eclapmsia; HTN, hypertension; HDP, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; ANC, antenatal care; ISSHP, International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy; ACOG, American College of Obstetrician and Gynaecologists; ESH–ESC, European Society of Hypertension–European Society of Cardiology.