Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 1;5:1315763. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1315763

Table 2.

Risk of bias assessment of included studies with persistent hypertension as a primary outcome (n = 20).

Author and year Selection Comparability Outcome Overall score Risk of bias
Exposed representation Selection of non-exposed group Ascertainment of HDP At the study start outcome was absent Adjustment for age and BMI Outcome assessment Follow up length Adequacy of follow up
Amougou et al. (57) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5/8 (62.5%) High
Babah et al. (48) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8/8 (100%) Low
Cho et al. (58) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6/8 (75.0%) Moderate
Fadalallah et al. (15) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7/8 (87.5%) Low
Tornes et al. (66) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7/8 (87.5%) Low
Ishaku et al. (35) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7/8 (87.5%) Low
Kaze et al. (14) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7/8 (87.5%) Low
Keepanasseril et al. (50) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7/8 (87.5%) Low
Lugobe et al. (64) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7/8 (87.5%) Low
Ma and Yao (51) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7/8 (87.5%) Low
Mooij et al. (62) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5/8 (62.5%) High
Muteke et al. (65) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7/8 (87.5%) Low
Nakimuli et al. (56) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7/8 (87.5%) Low
Ndayambagye et al. (52) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7/8 (87.5%) Low
Nganou-Gnindjio et al. (63) Yes Yes Yes Yes 4/8 (50.0%) High
Olagbuji et al. (53) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7/8 (87.5%) Low
Shahbazian et al. (59) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7/8 (87.5%) Low
Shammas (60) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7/8 (87.5%) Low
Sukmanee et al. (16) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5/8 (62.5%) High
Wang et al. (61) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8/8 (100%) Low