Table 3.
Network meta-analysis of MoCA (MD [95% CI]).
| MD (95%CI) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HF-rTMS | ||||
| −0.68(−5.21,3.85) | LF-rTMS | |||
| −1.16(−4.63,2.31) | −0.48(−5.05,4.08) | iTBS | ||
| −2.33(−5.03,0.37) | −1.65(−5.59,2.29) | −1.17(−3.50,1.17) | Sham | |
| −4.54(−6.61,-2.48)* | −3.86(−8.68,0.96) | −3.38(−7.37,0.61) | −2.21(−5.57,1.14) | CRT |
*The values between the 2 comparisons are statistically significant.HF-rTMS, high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; LF-rTMS, low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; iTBS, intermittent theta burst stimulation, sham: sham stimulation; CRT, conventional rehabilitation therapy.