Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 1;18:1354864. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1354864

Table 6.

Subgroup analysis of second outcomes.

Outcome indicator Intervention Comparison number SMD (95%CI) P I2(%)
UPDRS I HF-rTMS VS. CRT 2 −1.23(−2.86 to 0.41) 0.14 93%
LF-rTMS VS. CRT 2 −0.81(−1.12 to- 0.49) <0.00001 0%
Total 4 −1.00(−1.62 to −0.39) 0.001 80%
UPDRS II HF-rTMS VS. CRT 2 −3.37(−4.14 to −2.60) <0.00001 19%
LF-rTMS VS. CRT 2 −2.24(−4.66 to 0.18) 0.07 92%
Total 4 −2.86(−4.50 to −1.21) 0.0007 93%

SMD, standard mean difference; HF-rTMS, high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; LF-rTMS, low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; CRT, conventional rehabilitation therapy.