Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 1;11:1279931. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1279931

Table 2.

Means, differences, and agreement between parent-proxy reported measures and objective measures from clinic visits.

Parent-reporta Objective reporta Mean differenceb† Agreement
ICCc Pearson’s Rd
Overall group (n = 55)
Weight (kg) 17.1 (3.4) 17.4 (3.5) −0.2 (0.9) 0.97 0.97
Height (cm) 101.3 (11.4) 102.2 (9.5) −0.8 (4.8) 0.89 0.91
BMI (kg/m2) 16.7 (1.8) 16.5 (1.6) 0.1 (1.6) 0.57 0.57
BMI z-score 0.6 (1.2) 0.6 (1.1) 0.1 (1.1) 0.55 0.55
BMI % 65.6 (30.5) 66.9 (27.0) −1.2 (28.9) 0.50 0.50
≤7d TG group (n = 37)
Weight (kg) 17.5 (3.6) 17.7 (3.6) −0.2 (0.6) 0.98 0.98
Height (cm) 101.6 (12.5) 102.7 (9.6) −1.1 (4.7) 0.91 0.94
BMI (kg/m2) 16.9 (1.8) 16.7 (1.6) 0.3 (1.5) 0.61 0.62
BMI z-score 0.8 (1.2) 0.7 (1.0) 0.2 (1.0) 0.58 0.59
BMI % 70.5 (29.8) 68.4 (26.1) 2.1 (26.9) 0.53 0.53
>7d TG group (n = 18)
Weight (kg) 16.5 (3.2) 16.8 (3.5) −0.3 (1.2) 0.93 0.94
Height (cm) 100.7 (9.1) 101.0 (9.4) −0.3 (5.0) 0.86 0.85
BMI (kg/m2) 16.2 (1.7) 16.3 (1.5) −0.2 (1.7) 0.44 0.43
BMI z-score 0.2 (1.2) 0.4 (1.3) −0.2 (1.2) 0.48 0.47
BMI % 55.6 (30.4) 63.7 (29.1) −8.2 (31.5) 0.44 0.44
≤7d TG + Direct group (n = 24)
Weight (kg) 17.2 (3.0) 17.4 (2.9) −0.2 (0.4) 0.99 0.99
Height (cm) 101.2 (9.6) 103.0 (8.6) −1.8 (2.9) 0.93 0.95
BMI (kg/m2) 16.8 (1.5) 16.4 (1.4) 0.4 (0.9) 0.79 0.82
BMI z-score 0.8 (0.9) 0.5 (1.0) 0.3 (0.7) 0.67 0.71
BMI % 72.2 (25.7) 64.8 (26.6) 7.3 (20.8) 0.69 0.68
>7d TG + Direct group (n = 15)
Weight (kg) 16.4 (3.4) 16.6 (3.6) −0.2 (1.3) 0.93 0.93
Height (cm) 99.2 (7.9) 100.3 (9.9) −1.1 (4.5) 0.87 0.89
BMI (kg/m2) 16.5 (1.6) 16.3 (1.6) 0.2 (1.6) 0.54 0.53
BMI z-score 0.5 (1.1) 0.3 (1.4) 0.1 (1.0) 0.66 0.67
BMI % 62.6 (27.2) 62.4 (31.2) 0.1 (24.4) 0.67 0.66

Paired samples T-test; significant difference (Overall; Weight [p = 0.05], ≤7d TG + Direct; Height [p = 0.01], ≤7d TG + Direct; BMI [p = 0.02]).

aValues shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

bMean difference calculated by subtracting the mean of the objectively reported values from the mean of the self-reported values (MeanSelf-MeanObj).

cIntraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); <0.50 indicates poor reliability, 0.50–0.75 indicates moderate reliability, 0.75–0.90 indicates good reliability, and > 0.90 indicates excellent reliability.

dPearson’s correlation coefficient (Pearson’s R); values are interpreted on a continuum between − 1 (perfect negative correlation), 0 (no correlation) and + 1 (perfect positive correlation).