Table 3.
Summary of the morphological differences among Sporendonema species
| Species | Microscopy | Spore/Hyphae shape |
|---|---|---|
| S. aurantiacum | Hyphae and asci can be seen on slides from MEA while slides from PDA shows chlamydospore-like structures on the hyphae. Ascospores orange-yellow, globose and smooth | ![]() |
| S. casei | Slides from MEA shows the typical enteroarthric conidiogenesis while spherical orange spores and irregular hyphae can be seen only on the slides from PDA | ![]() |
| S. confluens | Ascospores are yellow but compared to S. rubrum and S. aurantiacum they have lighter color. Ascospores have slightly thick walls. Racquet hyphae are common on slides from MEA | ![]() |
| S. equinum | Holoblastic conidiogenesis with smooth and spherical conidia. Longer conidia chains compared to S. isthmoides | ![]() |
| S. isthmoides | Thallic-enteroarthric conidiogenesis with mostly lemon-shaped and warted conidia. Reveals remnants of hyphae between the conidia. Hyphae with warts are also common | ![]() |
| S. rubrum | Asci can be seen on slides from MEA while rocket hyphae are common on slides from PDA. Ascospores are orange-yellow, oblate with two equatorial thickenings | ![]() |





