Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 14;117(1):53. doi: 10.1007/s10482-024-01935-3

Table 3.

Summary of the morphological differences among Sporendonema species

Species Microscopy Spore/Hyphae shape
S. aurantiacum Hyphae and asci can be seen on slides from MEA while slides from PDA shows chlamydospore-like structures on the hyphae. Ascospores orange-yellow, globose and smooth graphic file with name 10482_2024_1935_Figa_HTML.gif
S. casei Slides from MEA shows the typical enteroarthric conidiogenesis while spherical orange spores and irregular hyphae can be seen only on the slides from PDA graphic file with name 10482_2024_1935_Figb_HTML.gif
S. confluens Ascospores are yellow but compared to S. rubrum and S. aurantiacum they have lighter color. Ascospores have slightly thick walls. Racquet hyphae are common on slides from MEA graphic file with name 10482_2024_1935_Figc_HTML.gif
S. equinum Holoblastic conidiogenesis with smooth and spherical conidia. Longer conidia chains compared to S. isthmoides graphic file with name 10482_2024_1935_Figd_HTML.gif
S. isthmoides Thallic-enteroarthric conidiogenesis with mostly lemon-shaped and warted conidia. Reveals remnants of hyphae between the conidia. Hyphae with warts are also common graphic file with name 10482_2024_1935_Fige_HTML.gif
S. rubrum Asci can be seen on slides from MEA while rocket hyphae are common on slides from PDA. Ascospores are orange-yellow, oblate with two equatorial thickenings graphic file with name 10482_2024_1935_Figf_HTML.gif