Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 14;14:6201. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56525-0

Table 1.

The effect of scenario on (a) black-grass density, (b) gross profit and (c) wheat yield. Data summarised across 27 management strategies within each scenario.

Scenario (a) Mean proportion of field with high and/or very high black-grass density… (b) Mean annual gross profit (c) Mean annual wheat yield
…At year 6 …Annually
(min, max) (min, max) (£ ha−1) (min, max) (t ha−1) (min, max)
BAU 0.75 (0.22; 0.95) 0.50 (0.12; 0.74) 614.42 (431.64; 819.71) 4.60 (3.67; 5.57)
MIT 0.24 (0.01; 0.62) 0.20 (0.09; 0.45) 595.14 (362.50; 891.44) 3.25 (1.94; 5.73)
CWW 0.49 (0.04; 0.75) 0.38 (0.03; 0.67) 287.33 (103.89; 506.83) 6.50 (5.19; 7.92)

BAU business as usual, MIT mitigation, CWW continuous winter wheat.

Minimum and maximum values show the range across regions, soil types and density-resistance categories.