Table 9.

Odds Ratios (OR) for having low physical activity as compared to higher (moderate or high) ^{a, b, c}

Variable (reference category)	B (SE)	OR (95% CI)	p value
Constant	-0.15 (0.63)	0.86 (0.24–2.95)	0.81
Gender (Female)
Male	0.09 (0.37)	1.10 (0.52–2.28)	0.81
Age (18–34)
35–54	1.27 (0.52)	3.56 (1.33–10.22)	< 0.05
55+	-0.01 (0.56)	0.99 (0.33–3.00)	0.98
Household income (£20,000–29,999)
Under £10,000	0.22 (0.91)	1.25 (0.22–8.53)	0.81
£10,000–19,999	-0.86 (0.58)	0.42 (0.13–1.29)	0.13
£30,000–39,999	-0.58 (0.54)	0.56 (0.19–1.61)	0.29
£40,000+	-1.01 (0.50)	0.36 (0.13–0.96)	< 0.05
Caring responsibilities (No)
Yes	-0.91 (0.39)	0.40 (0.18–0.85)	< 0.05
Diet (Regular meat-eater)
Flexitarian	0.13 (0.38)	1.14 (0.54–2.44)	0.73
Pescatarian	-1.83 (1.13)	0.16 (0.01–1.05)	0.11
Vegetarian	0.25 (0.51)	1.29 (0.47–3.50)	0.62
Vegan	-0.94 (0.80)	0.39 (0.07–1.75)	0.24
Food growing level (No food grown)
1 (very little F&V)	-0.05 (0.66)	0.95 (0.25–3.44)	0.94
2	0.38 (0.59)	1.46 (0.45–4.73)	0.52
3	0.45 (0.54)	1.56 (0.55–4.54)	0.41
4	0.93 (0.64)	2.53 (0.73–9.20)	0.15
5 (nearly self-sufficient in F&V)	0.99 (0.59)	2.68 (0.86–8.73)	0.09

^a Predictors and regression coefficients in the table are derived from the best fit model for the outcome based on the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Other explanatory variables tested include neighbourhood deprivation, household composition, higher education, smoking status, alcohol consumption, long-term health conditions, obesity, F&V intake, amount of time spent gardening, and having an allotment, but these were dropped in the process of improving model fit

^b Model R² = 0.11 (Hosmer Lemeshow), 0.14 (Cox and Snell), 0.19 (Nagelkerke); χ² (17) = 28.64

^c Figures in bold are statistically significant at the 5% level (p < 0.05)