Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 16;68(3):312–324. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxae005

Table 3.

Validation results (n = 25; randomly selected).

Category Significance of model Explained distribution Model’s goodness of fit Prediction results
χ 2 P Cox & Snell R Square ×2 Log likelihood Hosmer and Lemeshow Test (Sig.) Correctly predicted %
Input all PCs FFR 19.566 0.003
***
0.543 14.084a 0.719 84.0
ISO + key literature 8.286 0.141 0.282 25.365a 0.466 80.0
ISO 7.555 0.183 0.261 26.096a 0.205 72.0
Input top 5 measurements from PCA FFR 16.840 0.005
***
0.490 16.811a 0.830 84.0
ISO + key literature 8.573 0.127 0.290 25.078a 0.893 68.0
ISO 8.573 0.127 0.290 25.078a 0.893 68.0

*** P < 0.001.

To make the condition equivalent (5 measurements for each FFR-specific and traditional anthropometry), the FFR-specific face anthropometry’s PC 6 was not included in the analysis.