Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 12;12:e16980. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16980

Table 2. Comparison of SISCO-II-EA scores among participants by sex and effect size (Cohen’s d).

Variables Women Men t-statistic p-value d
M SD M SD
Stressors 3.298 0.595 3.010 0.671 t(399.6) = 6.16 <0.001 0.468
Physical and psychological reactions 3.210 0.683 2.770 0.739 t(412.5) = 8.48 <0.001 0.631
Social behavioural reactions 2.765 0.825 2.567 0.850 t(429.1) = 3.27 =0.001 0.237
Total reaction 3.053 0.675 2.698 0.712 t(420.9) = 7.05 <0.001 0.518
Coping strategies 3.140 0.632 3.114 0.673 t(417.6) = 0.55 0.585 0.040
Full instrument 3.133 0.474 2.859 0.524 t(405.5) = 7.47 <0.001 0.562

Notes.

M
arithmetic mean
SD
standard deviation
p-value
probability associated with the t-statistic
d
Cohen’s d

Bold represents significant differences (p ≤ 0.001).