Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 12;12:e16980. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16980

Table 3. Comparison of SISCO-II-EA scores between university of origin, and effect size (Eta squared).

Variables UdeC UDD UCSC F-statistical p-value eta 2
M SD M SD M SD
Stressors 3.257 0.621 3.203 0.634 3.178 0.626 F(2, 1,044) = 1.31 0.271 0.002
Physical and psychological reactions 3.075 0.699 3.130 0.749 3.115 0.736 F(2, 1,044) = 0.68 0.505 0.001
Social behavioural reactions 2.723 0.808 2.690 0.853 2.765 0.894 F(2, 1,044) = 0.44 0.645 0.001
Total reaction 2.951 0.677 2.975 0.720 2.992 0.737 F(2, 1,044) = 0.24 0.787 0.000
Coping strategies 3.141 0.636 3.165 0.639 3.011 0.667 F(2, 1,044) = 2.92 0.055 0.006
Full instrument 3.067 0.487 3.07 0.528 3.043 0.509 F(2, 1,044) = 0.15 0.861 0.000

Notes.

UDEC
Universidad de Concepción
UDD
Universidad del Desarrollo
UCSC
Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción
M
arithmetic mean
SD
standard deviation
p-value
probability associated with F statistic
eta2
Eta squared