Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 11;85(2):168–174. doi: 10.15288/jsad.23-00253

Table 2.

Results of logistic regression analyses predicting the likelihood of alcohol service refusal

graphic file with name jsad.23-00253tbl2.jpg

Variable OR [95% CI]
Establishment characteristics
 Cluster—general license, bar, more staff and patrons, bartender 1.01 [0.48, 2.14]
 Upscale/fine dining 2.36 [0.96, 5.79]
 Casual dining with table service 0.55 [0.27, 1.10]
 Theme bar/restaurant 0.76 [0.29, 1.97]
 Establishment activity 0.99 [0.70, 1.38]
 Warning sign—under 21 not allowed 0.65 [0.15, 2.82]
 Warning sign—pregnancy/cancer 1.13 [0.55, 2.33]
Server characteristics
 Age 0.99 [0.96, 1.03]
 Male 1.15 [0.59, 2.22]
 Race/ethnicity
  Hispanic/Latino 1.04 [0.32, 3.41]
  Asian 1.99 [0.76, 5.21]
  Black 2.82 [0.39, 20.67]
  Other race 1.56 [0.45, 5.35]
  Unknown race 1.61 [0.25, 10.56]
Pseudo-patron characteristics
 Female 3.71 [1.67, 8.24]**
 Obvious/very obvious display of intoxication 9.28 [1.99, 43.40]**
 Signs of intoxication 0.95 [0.69, 1.32]
Month
 August 2.39 [0.85, 6.70]
 September 1.16 [0.40, 3.31]
 October–January 2.34 [0.22, 24.89]
Day
 Friday 1.02 [0.46, 2.27]
 Saturday 1.02 [0.44, 2.35]
Hour
 7–8 p.m. 0.85 [0.36, 2.04]
 8–10 p.m. 0.71 [0.28, 1.83]

Notes: Referent categories include establishments with a beer/wine license, restaurants, fewer staff and patrons, and table servers (cluster); white servers (server characteristics); July (month); Thursday (day); and 5–7 P.M. (hour). OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval.

**

p < .01.