Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 15;20(3):2089–2101. doi: 10.1002/alz.13686

TABLE 3.

Results of logistic regression analyses including baseline values of scalable plasma and TabCAT‐BHA markers as predictors, demographic and clinical covariates, and Aβ‐PET status as an outcome (n = 105; 47 Aβ‐PET negative, 58 Aβ‐PET positive).

β SE P‐Value
Full model (AIC = 61)
Plasma Aβ42/40 −94.009 47.496 0.048
Plasma pTau181 2.202 0.714 0.002
Plasma NfL −0.081 0.034 0.017
Plasma GFAP 0.001 0.006 0.886
TabCAT‐BHA −0.827 0.368 0.025
Age (years) 0.132 0.068 0.050
Sex (female) −0.290 1.033 0.779
Education (years) 0.117 0.239 0.625
APOE ε4 allele 2.138 1.285 0.096
PET/Plasma time difference (days) 0.005 0.003 0.103
Optimal model (AIC = 63)
Plasma Aβ42/40 −94.597 34.328 0.006
Plasma pTau181 2.435 0.559 <0.001
Plasma NfL −0.088 0.031 0.005
TabCAT‐BHA −0.619 0.258 0.016
Age (years) 0.079 0.046 0.085
pTau181, TabCAT‐BHA, age (AIC = 84)
Plasma pTau181 1.977 0.432 <0.001
TabCAT‐BHA −0.525 0.195 0.007
Age (years) 0.054 0.037 0.139
pTau181, age (AIC = 92)
Plasma pTau181 2.091 0.407 <0.001
Age (years) 0.019 0.031 0.527

Abbreviations: Aβ‐PET, amyloid β positron emission tomography; AIC, Akaike information criterion; APOE, apolipoprotein E; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; NfL, neurofilament light; PET, positron emission tomography; SE, standard error; TabCAT‐BHA, Tablet‐based Cognitive Assessment Tool Brain Health Assessment.