Table 3.
Comparison of the proposed methods' performance study.
| Method | Classifiers | Accuracy (%) | Precision (%) | Recall (%) | F1-Score (%) | AUC (%) | Miss Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCA | LR | 75.75 | 68.44 | 80.16 | 73.84 | 82.82 | 24.20 |
| RF | 92.31 | 89.50 | 94.84 | 92.09 | 97.79 | 7.69 | |
| KNN | 88.75 | 80.65 | 96.23 | 87.76 | 93.95 | 11.20 | |
| SVM | 87.31 | 81.06 | 92.63 | 86.45 | 91.06 | 12.60 | |
| GB | 86.35 | 82.03 | 89.78 | 85.73 | 90.45 | 13.60 | |
| XGB | 91.52 | 87.58 | 95.08 | 91.18 | 96.07 | 8.48 | |
| FA | LR | 78.80 | 73.52 | 82.20 | 77.62 | 86.96 | 21.20 |
| RF | 91.70 | 89.84 | 93.43 | 91.60 | 97.71 | 8.30 | |
| KNN | 89.43 | 82.37 | 95.92 | 88.63 | 94.20 | 10.50 | |
| SVM | 83.88 | 77.64 | 88.71 | 82.80 | 91.80 | 16.10 | |
| GB | 84.80 | 79.83 | 88.65 | 84.01 | 91.61 | 15.20 | |
| XGB | 90.50 | 86.69 | 93.83 | 90.12 | 95.84 | 9.50 | |
| PCA-FA | LR | 80.48 | 75.51 | 83.85 | 79.46 | 88.46 | 19.50 |
| RF | 92.55 | 90.53 | 94.35 | 92.40 | 98.15 | 7.45 | |
| KNN | 89.54 | 82.16 | 96.37 | 88.70 | 94.16 | 10.40 | |
| SVM | 86.38 | 80.72 | 91.02 | 85.56 | 93.35 | 13.60 | |
| GB | 86.38 | 82.03 | 89.85 | 85.76 | 92.75 | 13.60 | |
| XGB | 91.52 | 87.58 | 95.08 | 91.18 | 97.37 | 8.48 | |
| FPCA | SVM | 83.26 | 77.09 | 87.94 | 82.16 | 91.06 | 16.70 |
| RF | 91.90 | 89.50 | 94.02 | 91.70 | 97.78 | 8.10 | |
| XGB | 90.02 | 87.01 | 93.44 | 89.61 | 96.07 | 9.98 | |
| Stacking | 92.28 | 91.29 | 93.48 | 92.37 | 97.76 | 7.72 | |
| Ensemble | SVM | 90.36 | 85.18 | 95.02 | 89.83 | 95.21 | 9.64 |
| Feature | RF | 92.42 | 92.18 | 92.62 | 92.40 | 96.50 | 7.58 |
| XGB | 94.78 | 94.37 | 95.15 | 94.76 | 98.78 | 5.58 | |
| Stacking | 94.89 | 94.43 | 95.40 | 94.91 | 98.88 | 5.11 |