Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 16;20:41. doi: 10.1186/s13007-024-01165-8

Table 2.

Method validation parameter summary (for detailed description see „method Validation“chapter)

Analyte Spiked content (pmol) Average Accuracy (%bias) Average Precision (%RSD) Average Process Efficiency (%) Average Matrix Effect (%) Average Recovery (%)
ACC 2-200 5.59 3.2 21.01 23.74 88.17
tZ 0.01–0.1 10.02 1.81 44.92 58.56 90.92
cZ 0.01-1 8.92 0.84 42.66 63.98 68.18
iP 0.01-1 6.12 2.71 39.12 49.19 80.4
tZR 0.01-1 12.3 2.44 39.76 45.74 87.53
cZR 1 12.16 2.05 62.43 75.53 82.65
iPR 0.01-1 12.65 1.94 56.12 83.94 65.1
IAA 0.1–100 12.72 1.63 50.38 80.08 63.53
oxIAA 10–100 11.81 1.82 44.93 59.88 75.17
IAA-Glu 0.1–100 8.63 3.2 77.57 95.95 81.71
IAA-Asp 0.1–100 7.48 2.06 66.13 81.82 80.95
ABA 0.1–100 10.39 1.62 72.15 106.27 69.85
JA 0.1–100 8.31 2.48 68.21 96.72 70.76
JA-Ile 1 6.98 4.95 17.69 48.12 36.74
SA 0.5–50 9.31 1.87 106.88 133.62 79.94

Values for Average Process Efficiency, Average Matrix Effect and Average Recovery are means ± SD; n = 4. Accuracy and precision were estimated by spiking 10 mg of FW A. thaliana with authentic standards (n = 4)