Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 15;24:290. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05233-4

Table 2.

Comparison of observer’s questionnaire scores between TM and 3D groups [This table should be placed below the second paragraph of the Results section]

TM 3D P
Junior ophthalmology residents and trainee doctors ( N  = 15)
Interest and enthusiasm in learning 5.2 ± 1.3 8.7 ± 1.1 < 0.001*
Learning atmosphere and interaction 5.5 ± 1.5 8.9 ± 0.9 < 0.001*
Deep and scientific thinking 5.9 ± 1.6 8.1 ± 1.0 < 0.001*
The understanding of anatomical structure 5.4 ± 1.4 7.6 ± 0.9 < 0.001*
The understanding of surgical procedures 6.6 ± 1.4 7.4 ± 1.3 0.116
The understanding of surgical cooperation 6.2 ± 1.8 7.7 ± 1.1 0.010*
Active operation cooperation 7.9 ± 1.6 7.6 ± 1.4 0.589
Surgical Instrument recognition 8.1 ± 0.9 8.2 ± 1.2 0.798
Instrument adjustment 8.8 ± 1.1 6.1 ± 1.7 < 0.001*
Resolution of the surgical field 6.2 ± 1.8 8.7 ± 1.1 < 0.001*
Stereoscopic sensation 8.5 ± 1.6 8.3 ± 1.4 0.718
Magnification 6.1 ± 1.6 7.9 ± 1.3 0.002*
Depth of Field 8.3 ± 1.4 8.1 ± 1.6 0.718
Visual field 7.6 ± 1.3 7.3 ± 1.2 0.527
Time latency between surgical interventions and their visualization 8.5 ± 1.3 8.4 ± 1.1 0.822
Comfort level of learning 6.4 ± 1.8 8.8 ± 0.9 < 0.001*
General satisfaction 7.1 ± 1.2 8.3 ± 1.0 0.006*
The confidence in mastery of surgical procedures 5.5 ± 1.5 6.9 ± 1.3 0.011*
Exam Score 7.1 ± 1.3 7.4 ± 1.2 0.517
Overall score 130.9 ± 27.4 150.4 ± 22.7 0.043 *
Trainee nurses ( N  = 15)
Interest and enthusiasm in learning 5.4 ± 2.0 7.1 ± 1.5 0.014*
Learning atmosphere and interaction 6.1 ± 1.1 7.7 ± 1.2 < 0.001*
Deep and scientific thinking 5.8 ± 1.3 8.2 ± 1.7 < 0.001*
The understanding of anatomical structure 4.4 ± 2.0 6.7 ± 1.8 0.003*
The understanding of surgical procedures 5.7 ± 1.3 7.2 ± 1.4 0.005*
The understanding of surgical cooperation 6.6 ± 1.0 8.4 ± 0.9 < 0.001*
Surgical Instrument recognition 7.2 ± 1.2 8.5 ± 0.9 0.002*
Instrument preparation 7.7 ± 1.4 7.8 ± 1.6 0.857
Active operation cooperation 7.4 ± 1.6 7.7 ± 1.5 0.600
The quality of surgical observation 4.2 ± 2.1 8.5 ± 0.8 < 0.001*
Comfort level of learning 5.6 ± 1.6 8.7 ± 0.8 < 0.001*
Visual field 5.1 ± 1.6 8.2 ± 1.1 < 0.001*
Stereoscopic sensation 3.9 ± 1.8 8.3 ± 1.0 < 0.001*
General satisfaction 5.1 ± 2.0 8.2 ± 1.3 < 0.001*
The confidence in mastery of surgical procedures 6.2 ± 1.9 7.9 ± 1.4 0.009*
Exam Score 5.3 ± 1.3 7.7 ± 1.5 < 0.001*
Overall score 91.7 ± 25.2 126.8 ± 20.4 < 0.001 *
Visitors ( N  = 15)
Interest and enthusiasm in observation 3.9 ± 2.1 8.1 ± 1.1 < 0.001*
Learning atmosphere and interaction 4.2 ± 1.3 7.8 ± 1.8 < 0.001*
Deep and scientific thinking 3.4 ± 1.5 8.0 ± 1.3 < 0.001*
The understanding of anatomical structure 3.6 ± 1.0 7.6 ± 1.7 < 0.001*
The understanding of surgical procedures 4.1 ± 1.4 7.7 ± 1.5 < 0.001*
The quality of surgical observation 4.2 ± 1.2 8.1 ± 1.1 < 0.001*
Visual field 4.4 ± 1.3 7.0 ± 1.8 < 0.001*
Stereoscopic sensation 3.1 ± 1.1 8.2 ± 1.0 < 0.001*
General satisfaction 4.0 ± 1.5 8.5 ± 1.3 < 0.001*
Overall score 34.9 ± 12.4 71.0 ± 12.6 < 0.001 *

*P < 0.05

Abbreviations TM, traditional microscopic; 3D, three-dimensional