Quality Assessment Strobe Score Reviewer 2
Studies	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16	17	18	Total
Kvaal et al. [1]	2	2	2	1	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	0	0.5	2	0	29.5
Kolltveit et al. [34]	0.5	1	2	2	2	2	2	2	1	2	2	2	0	2	0	1	2	0	25.5
Bosmans et al. [21]	2	2	2	1	2	2	2	0	2	2	2	2	2	2	0	0.5	2	0	27.5
Landa et al. [10]	2	1	2	1	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	0.5	1	2	0	29.5
Sharma and Srivastava [25]	2	0.5	0	1	0	2	2	2	2	0	0	2	2	0.5	0	0.5	2	0	18.5
Saxena et al. [24]	2	1	2	1	2	2	2	2	2	0	2	2	2	1	0	0.5	1	0	24.5
Erbudak et al. [14]	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	1	2	0	31
Limdiwala and Shah [22]	2	1	2	1	2	2	2	0	2	0	0	2	2	1	1	1	0.5	0	21.5
Misirlioglu et al. [26]	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	0	2	2	0	32
Patil et al. [15]	2	0.5	2	1	2	2	2	2	2	0	2	2	2	2	0	0	2	0	25.5
Karkhanis et al. [16]	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	0	2	0	2	2	2	2	0	2	2	0	26
Mittal et al. [23]	2	1	2	1	2	2	2	0	2	2	1	2	2	2	0	0.5	1	0	24.5
Marroquin Penaloza et al. [31]	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	0	2	2	2	2	0	1	2	0	29
Marroquin Penaloza et al. [30]	2	1	2	2	2	2	2	1	2	2	2	2	2	2	0	0	2	2	30
Roh et al. [12]	2	2	2	2	0	2	2	2	2	0	0.5	2	2	2	0	2	2	0	26.5
Li et al. [9]	2	1	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	0.5	1	2	2	32.5
Akay et al. [11]	0	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	0	1	2	2	31
Hisham et al. [28]	2	1	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	0	1	2	0	30
Hisham et al. [33]	2	0.5	2	1	2	2	2	0	2	0	2	2	2	2	0	1	2	0	24.5
Li et al. [29]	2	1	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	0	2	2	2	2	0	0.5	2	2	29.5
Chandan et al. [27]	2	2	1	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	0	0.5	2	2	31.5
Vossoughi et al. [32]	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	0	0.5	2	2	32.5