Table 2.
Comparison of mean ± SD of body weight, FI, and BMI before and after intervention.
| Variables | D + AT + HD | D + AT + MD | D + HD | D + MD | D + AT + oil | D + C | SHAM | P-valuea |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | ||||||||
| Before | 316.87 ± 1.72 | 316.87 ± 1.72 | 308.75 ± 2.60 | 306 ± 2.50 | 313.87 ± 1.88 | 313.87 ± 1.88 | 224.12 ± 4.96 | |
| After | 281.62 ± 2.06 | 286.62 ± 2.38 | 293.37 ± 2.55 | 295.62 ± 2.26 | 293.50 ± 2.20 | 293.50 ± 2.20 | 228.87 ± 5.27 | |
| P† | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* | |
| Δ | − 35.25 ± 0.462A | − 30.25 ± 2.434B | − 15.37 ± 0.517D | − 10.37 ± 0.744E | − 20.37 ± 0.517C | 16.75 ± 0.464G | 4.75 ± 0.460F | 0.001¥ |
| FI (g/day) | ||||||||
| Before | 20.25 ± 2.12 | 18.87 ± 1.35 | 17.25 ± 1.48 | 16.75 ± 1.48 | 18.12 ± 2.16 | 19.87 ± 1.88 | 12.75 ± 1.66 | |
| After | 16.37 ± 1.68 | 15.75 ± 1.28 | 15.12 ± 1.24 | 15.12 ± 1.52 | 15.43 ± 2.63 | 22.62 ± 1.76 | 13.37 ± 1.50 | |
| P† | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.003* | 0.013* | 0.002* | 0.001* | 0.049* | |
| Δ | − 3.87 ± 1.246A | − 3.12 ± 0.640AB | − 2.12 ± 0.640BCDE | − 1.62 ± 0.231CDE | − 2.68 ± 0.883BC | 2.75 ± 0.462 G | 0.62 ± 0.744F | 0.001¥ |
| BMI (kg/m2) | ||||||||
| Before | 0.78 ± 0.138 | 0.79 ± 0.061 | 0.83 ± 0.068 | 0.75 ± 0.083 | 0.81 ± 0.059 | 0.81 ± 0.105 | 0.60 ± 0.062 | |
| After | 0.70 ± 0.122 | 0.72 ± 0.056 | 0.79 ± 0.064 | 0.72 ± 0.081 | 0.76 ± 0.056 | 0.85 ± 0.111 | 0.61 ± 0.064 | |
| P† | 0.001* | 0.002* | 0.004* | 0.011* | 0.003* | 0.004* | 0.046* | |
| Δ | − 0.08 ± 0.0158A | − 0.06 ± 0.005B | − 0.04 ± 0.003D | − 0.02 ± 0.002E | − 0.05 ± 0.004C | 0.04 ± 0.006G | 0.01 ± 0.001F | 0.001¥ |
BMI Body Mass Index, FI Food Intake, WC Waist Circumference, D + AT + HD Diabetic + Aerobic Training + High Dose of Vitamin D, D + AT + MD Diabetic + Aerobic Training + Moderate Dose of Vitamin D, HD Diabetic + High Dose of Vitamin D, MD Diabetic + Moderate Dose of Vitamin D, D + AT + oil Diabetic + Aerobic Training + Sesame Oil, D + C Diabetic + Sesame Oil, SHAM Non-Diabetic Control.
Data analysis was done by the analysis of one-way analysis of variance test followed by post hoc Tukey's test; P† Statistical analysis was done by paired sample t-test; *Significantly different in comparison pre and post-within the groups; P-valueaStatistical analysis was done by one-way analysis test; ¥Significantly different comparing Δ between groups.
The mean values followed by different letters (A, B, C, D, E, F, and G) mean significantly different at the 0.05 level (p < 0.05). The values followed by the same letter are not significantly different. Dissimilar letters represent a significant difference between the groups.