Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 4;15:1270543. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1270543

Table 2.

Engagement, treatment satisfaction and negative effects by group.

Variables All participants
n (%)
Pilot study sample
n (%)
Benchmarking study sample
n (%)
Significance
(X2 or t-test)
Engagement (N= 175) (N=41) (N=134)
Completed ≥ 3 lessons 123 (70.3) 29 (70.7) 94 (70.1) p=.943
Completed all lessons 91 (52.0) 19 (46.3) 72 (53.7) p=.407
Message sent to therapists; Mean (SD) 7.21 (2.35) 7.02 (2.44) 7.27 (2.33) p=.562
Number of phone calls; Mean (SD) 1.22 (1.29) 1.22 (1.13) 1.22 (1.33) p=.989
Satisfaction (N=101) (N=22) (N=79)
Satisfied overall 77 (76.2) 18 (81.8) 59 (74.7) p=.487
Satisfied with materials 84 (83.2) 20 (90.9) 64 (81.0) p=.350*
Increased confidence to manage their symptoms 83 (79.7) 20 (90.9) 63 (79.7) p=.347*
Increased motivation to seek other treatments if needed 87 (86.1) 20 (90.9) 67 (84.8) p=.729*
Course was worth the time 95 (94.1) 21 (95.5) 74 (93.7) p=1.00*
Would confidently recommend the course to a friend 77 (97.5) 21 (95.5) 98 (97.0) p=.525*
Negative effects (N=100) (N=22) (N=78)
Reported negative effects 11 (11.0) 1(4.5) 10 (12.8) p=.448*

SD, Standard deviation; *Fisher’s Exact Test.