Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 4;12:1332412. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1332412

Table 3.

Range of competency development work depicted in literature.

Competency development focus n (%) 120 (100%)
Aspect of competency focus* (n = 120/120, 100%) n/120 (100%)
Purpose of study in terms of competency development
Professional development 59 (49%)
Student development 43 (36%)
Building competency statements/frameworks 12 (10%)
Curriculum development 12 (10%)
Other (e.g., Assessing competencies in practitioners, evaluating frameworks) 8 (7%)
Refreshing existing frameworks 1 (1%)
Competency assessment method* (n = 111/120, 93%) n/111 (100%)
How competencies statements/frameworks were developed or assessed
Survey 61 (55%)
Pre- and Post-Survey 37 (33%)
Interviews 29 (26%)
Other (e.g., Critical Reflection, Course Evaluation) 24 (22%)
Focus groups 9 (8%)
Organization/Institution conducting training* (n = 120/120, 100%) n/120 (100%)
Organizer of the professional development or student training
University 91 (76%)
Collaboration 34 (28%)
Government 26 (22%)
Community-based organization 13 (11%)
Public health unit 11 (9%)
Other (e.g., National Research Network, Training Center) 11 (9%)
Not-For-Profit 4 (3%)
Healthcare organization 2 (2%)
Focus of professional development/student training* (n = 97/120, 81%) n/97 (100%)
Focus of training for practitioners and students
Other (e.g., participatory research for health equity, cultural competency) 44 (45%)
General public health 27 (28%)
Evidence-informed decision-making 13 (13%)
Crisis and/or risk communication 13 (13%)
Cultural competency 6 (6%)
Focus of competency framework* (n = 23/120, 19%) n/23 (100%)
Discipline related to competency statement and framework development
Foundational 8 (35%)
Other 8 (35%)
Epidemiology 3 (13%)
Evidence-informed decision-making 1 (4%)
Health communication 1 (4%)
Public health medicine 1 (4%)
Competency development focus n (%) 120 (100%)
Public health nutrition 1 (4%)
Type of professional development* (n = 66/120, 55%) n/66 (100%)
Method and/or mode of professional development
Online 26 (39%)
Organizational 21 (32%)
Community-based partnership 13 (20%)
Academic course 9 (14%)
Academic program 2 (3%)
Type of student training* (n = 49/120, 41%) n/49 (100%)
Method and/or mode of student training
Academic course 20 (41%)
Academic program 14 (29%)
Internship/practicum 11 (22%)
Online course 5 (10%)
Community-based 3 (6%)
Pedagogy identified* (n = 50/120, 42%) n/50 (100%)
Method and practice of teaching and learning identified
Experiential learning 20 (40%)
Adult learning 17 (34%)
Other 17 (34%)
Community-engaged scholarship 7 (14%)
Case-based learning 5 (10%)

*Multiple categories possible for each article, thus may not total 100%.

The bolded numbers indicate the number of studies that relate to that particular focus/subheading. So, the subvariables under each subheading are a proportion of the total bolded number for each subheading.