Skip to main content
Non-coding RNA Research logoLink to Non-coding RNA Research
. 2024 Feb 10;9(2):288–293. doi: 10.1016/j.ncrna.2024.02.008

Model construction and application for predicting pre-eclampsia by Sonoclot coagulation analyzer

Hongyu Shi a, Weijie Wang b,1, Fan Li b,1, Ao Guo c, Tiecheng Liu c,
PMCID: PMC10945131  PMID: 38505305

Abstract

Maternal age has significantly increased among Chinese women, thereby posing risk of pregnancy-related complications. Preeclampsia is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality, and coagulation analysis in conjunction with clinical signs and symptoms are generally used for its diagnosis with limited efficacy. Sonoclot coagulation analyzer is effective in assessing coagulation function used during cerebral surgery and cardiovascular surgery. However, its use has not been explored in preeclampsia. Here, we investigated the potential use of Sonoclot in diagnosing preeclampsia in obstetrics cases. Subjects meeting the screening criteria were divided either into a test group or a control group, according to whether they were preeclamptic or not. We recorded the Sonoclot-derived coagulation and the routine coagulation parameters including platelet function (PF), activated clotting time (ACT) and clot rate (CR), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin time (TT), fibrinogen (FIB), and platelet count. Regression analysis was done on the relevant parameters to assess the feasibility of Sonoclot analyzer in preeclampsia diagnosis. In parallel, changes in preeclampsia lncRNAs was also evaluated. Significant differences were recorded in PT and ACT between the two groups. In the monovariant logistic regression, PT and ACT appeared to be reliable predictor variables. In the multinomial logistic regression, a total of five regression steps were performed with decreasing AIC values. The K-fold cross validation resulted in an accuracy rate (ACC) of 77.5%, a false positive rate of 16.4%, and a false negative rate of 33.2%. lncRNAs ANRIL and HOXD-AS1 were found deregulated. Our findings indicate that Sonoclot may be useful for diagnosis of preeclampsia in obstetrics.

Keywords: Preeclampsia, Clot rate, Platelet function, Activated clotting time, Platelet count

1. Introduction

The increased maternal age in recent years has led to an increase in the incidence of pregnancy complications. Preeclampsia (PE) may cause placental abruption, acute renal failure, intracranial hemorrhage, and in severe cases, can potentially endanger the life of women in labor [1]. The pathogenesis of preeclampsia has not yet been fully elucidated, and most researchers favor a two-stage theory to explain it. The first stage is due to inadequate recasting of the spiral arteries caused by superficial trophoblast implantation, while the second stage is due to maternal endothelial cell dysfunction and imbalance between angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors [2]. According to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), a woman should be considered as having a high risk of PE if she has any one of the following conditions: diabetes, autoimmune diseases, chronic hypertension, chronic kidney disease, or prior hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. In addition, a woman may be deemed to be high risk if she meets two of the following criteria: first birth age under 40, body mass index below 35 kg/m2, a family history of PE, or a gestational age between pregnancies of at least ten years [3]. The NICE guidelines for screening, however, have a low detection rate, are ineffective at predicting the likelihood of PE, and have a high proportion of false positives. For example, while using the NICE guidelines for screening, the detection rate for simple PE, full-term PE, and false positives was 39%, 34%, and 10.3%, respectively [4]. This could result in underdiagnosis of high-risk mothers on one hand and to overmedication on the other, and hence there is a need for developing a novel diagnostic method.

The Sonoclot analyzer determines various parameters related to coagulation including fibrinogen monomer formation, and fibrinolysis in whole blood, plasma, or citrate-containing blood samples [5]. The analyzer can also evaluate values including sonoclot-activated clotting time (SonAct), platelet function (PF), clotting rate (CR) and time to peak (TP). SonACT is similar to the conventional activated clotting time (ACT), which is mainly related to clotting factors. PF and CR respectively indicate platelet function independent of platelet number and plasma fibrinogen level. TP indicates the speed of clotting contraction and is an indirect measure of the strength of platelet function. The Sonoclot analyzer has been traditionally employed in liver transplantat surgery, cardiovascular surgery, neurosurgery and other surgeries involving significant bleeding volume. Lately, it is also used in intensive care of pregnant women and children [[6], [7], [8], [9]]. Here, we investigated the feasibility of applying Sonoclot in the diagnosis of PE.

2. Methods

This single-center study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of Jilin University. All patients included in the study signed the relevant informed consent forms. The study population was patients who visited the obstetrics department from March 2021 to August 2022. Patients included in the study were required to meet the following criteria: (1) fasting, (2) no history of alcohol consumption in the last 3 months, (3) no history of drug use, (4) no history of lipid-lowering medication, (5) good rest in the last 3 months, and (6) negative maternal urine protein test results in the normal group. Exclusion criteria: (1) those with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, hyperthyroidism, and rheumatic diseases; (2) those with combined tuberculosis, chronic kidney disease and chronic hepatitis; (3) those with twin fetuses and fetal malformations; and (4) those with severe immunological diseases, malignant tumors and inflammatory diseases.

By these criteria, a total of 121 patients were included in the study, and all patients were divided into an experimental group (77 patients) and a control group (44 patients) according to the presence or absence of typical preeclampsia symptoms. All pregnant women in the preeclampsia group met the relevant diagnostic criteria for preeclampsia. After admission, 3 ml venous blood was drawn and discarded, and then 2 ml of venous blood was drawn as a sample for subsequent use.

2.1. Operation procedure of sonoclot analyzer

The Sonoclot coagulation analyzer was preheated to 37 °C, and 1 ml venous blood was drawn and pushed out into the blood cup cup that was placed on a reaction cell that could be rotated back and forth at an angle of 4°45'. The data generated by the analyzer was collected and divided into two predesignated groups, and presented as mean ± SD. For the test of significance, we used Student's t-test. A visual violin plot was also drawn based on the obtained data.

2.2. Model construction

Logistic regression applicable to binary response variables were selected for this study and the final results were based on the multivariate logistic regression results. The univariate logistic regression results were used as a reference for screening the predictor variables. In the process of identifying predictor variables, we calculated the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) value for each model, and in the case of decreasing AIC, we concluded that the newly constructed model better reflects the true situation. We also calculated the overdispersion for each model. When the overdispersion test was significant (p < 0.05), it meant that the variance of the observed response variable was larger than the variance of the expected binomial distribution, wherein we applied the logistic regression of the negative binomial distribution model.

2.3. Model evaluation

After constructing the prediction model, we first analyzed its multicollinearity and calculated the variance inflation factor (VIF) of the fitted model. We determined that VIF> 4 indicated the possibility of multicollinearity. Where this happened, we applied a elastic net approach to attenuate their mutual multicollinearity by adding a penalty to the coefficients in the fitted regression model. Finally, to prevent our model from underfitting or overfitting, we evaluated the performance of the model by applying the K-fold cross-validation method.

2.4. LncRNA evaluation

RNA was extracted using Direct-zol RNA Miniprep extraction kit (Zymo research, USA) and we detected the levels of lncRNAs by emplying quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) using QuantiNova SYBR Green PCR kit (Qiagen, China), following the instructions from the manufacturer, and as described recently [10].

2.5. Statistical evaluation

T-test was used to compare the findings from two groups, experimental vs. control, under the guidance of a statistician. p values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

3. Results

The data distribution are presented in Table 1 and Fig. 1. The data from both groups were analyzed by t-test which showed the prolongation of PT and the change in the ACT values between the groups to be statistically significant, thus suggesting that PT and ACT were reliable predictor variables (Table 1). The results of monovariant logistic regression are shown in Table 2, which confirmed that PT and ACT were reliable predictor variables. In the multivariate logistic regression (Table 3 and Table 4), a total of five regression steps were performed with decreasing AIC values. The model fitted at each step showed no evidence of overdispersion (p > 0.05). There was no evidence of multicollinearity in the models fitted at each step (VIF <4). The K-fold method of cross-validation resulted in an accuracy rate (ACC) of 77.5%, a false positive rate (FPR) of 16.4%, and a false inverse rate of 33.2%.

Table 1.

t-test results.

Variables Mean of control SD of control Mean of disease SD of disease T value Degree of freedom P Value
APTT 30.11395349 4.881577682 31.19210526 5.512646386 −1.103815678 96.37647759 0.272421505
PT 11.72325581 0.784625239 10.47539474 1.488152717 5.98602361 116.5587118 2.43 × 10−8
TT 13.90697674 1.543403066 13.76447368 1.9244188 0.441615162 103.5274572 0.659688739
FIB 3.689767442 0.946327459 3.611052632 0.866443426 0.449217248 81.07572882 0.654473492
PLT 224.3488372 67.48681837 222.7631579 75.31743816 0.118006485 95.49547931 0.906310378
ACT 121.1395349 26.02524543 161.9868421 59.44285624 −5.177423743 111.5613287 1.01 × 10−6
CR 20.12325581 8.727538168 21.79605263 13.76762813 −0.809955649 115.4094193 0.419632568
PF 3.06744186 0.994681315 2.921052632 0.969441872 0.778323628 85.45405129 0.438528052

SD: standard deviation.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Violin plot of the indicators for the disease group and the control group.

Table 2.

Results of monovariant logistic regression.

Variables OR(95%CI) Beta P value P value of OD
APTT 1.04(0.97–1.12) −0.669018117 0.287258441 0.430792632
PT 0.46(0.32–0.66)* 9.274075385 2.52 × 10−5 0.232058365
TT 0.96(0.78–1.18) 1.18762968 0.675577584 0.432316713
FIB 0.9(0.59–1.38) 0.934135015 0.642931262 0.430496899
PLT 1(0.99–1) 0.637952122 0.90811663 0.43115687
ACT 1.02(1.01–1.03)* −2.48686264 0.000202033 0.718022099
CR 1.01(0.98–1.04) 0.328139242 0.47039984 0.437399847
PF 0.86(0.58–1.26) 1.036734333 0.431254131 0.430223634

CI: confidence interval; OD: overdispersion; * refer to significant results.

Table 3.

Results of multivariable logistic regression.

Variables Beta SE P Value OR Upper of 95% CI Lower of 95% CI
(Intercept) 2.182441058 2.763978326 0.429760611 8.867926985 1997.873365 0.039361919
APTT 0.091322436 0.049646345 0.065847642 1.095622217 1.20759318 0.994033472
PT −0.866239476 0.210002155 3.71 × 10−5 0.420529993 0.634679424 0.278637479
ACT 0.031651849 0.008274395 0.000130625 1.032158096 1.049033919 1.015553755
CR 0.042693481 0.022730207 0.060344145 1.043617957 1.091163639 0.998144

CI: confidence interval; SE: standard error; OR: odds ratio.

Table 4.

Model selection process based on AIC values.

Steps Formula AIC P value of OD VIF value Advices
1 mrk ∼ APTT + PT + TT + FIB + PLT + ACT + CR + PF 120 0.557383816 1.397281936 delete PF
2 mrk ∼ APTT + PT + TT + FIB + PLT + ACT + CR 118 0.497255629 1.350604228 delete PLT
3 mrk ∼ APTT + PT + TT + FIB + ACT + CR 116 0.520776154 1.345347337 delete FIB
4 mrk ∼ APTT + PT + TT + ACT + CR 114 0.533914084 1.33968588 delete TT
5 mrk ∼ APTT + PT + ACT + CR 113 0.467691737 1.223057291 best fitted

AIC: Akaike information criterion; OD: overdispersion.

Additionally, we also sought to study a possible deregulation of non-coding RNAs such as ANRIL and HOXD-AS1 in preeclampsia. Our results show that the levels of these two lncRNAs show different trends in preeclampsia patients. ANRIL was significantly reduced and downregulated to less than half the levels in preeclampsia patients, when compared to control group (p < 0.001). At the same time, HOXD-AS1 was significantly upregulated in preeclampsia patients, when compared to control group, p < 0.001 (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Levels of lncRNAs ANRIL and HOXD-AS1 in preeclampsia (PE) patient, compared to controls. Levels of lncRNAs were detected by quantitative real time PCR and absolute values were compared. p values of relative expression are provided.

4. Discussion

Preeclampsia is one of the most common obstetric disorders, with approximately 40,000 maternal deaths per year due to this disorder during pregnancy. In a cross-sectional study, it was revealed that the incidence in China is quote similar to western countries but whereas two-thirds of cases in Sweden are mild, the corresponding two-thirds of cases in China are severe [11]. The pathogenesis is not yet fully elucidated and the diagnosis of preeclampsia is complex [12]. The diagnosis is often made by combining proteinuria and hypertension, although this approach has limited use because both symptoms are secondary, downstream signs of the disease. More recent critera also include maternal organ dysfunction such as renal insufficiency, liver involvement, neurological or hematologic complications, subplacental dysfunction, or fetal growth restriction [13]. If left untreated, preeclampsia can be fatal, and the condition is one of the leading causes of maternal and child mortality in under-resourced settings [14]. Research is underway to improve the diagnosis of preeclampsia and to enable universal screening. As described before, NICE guideline has limited use in determining the risk factor for developing PE in pregnant women [4].

PLGF is a glycosylated dimeric protein secreted by trophoblast cells and is a member of the vascular endothelial growth factor family. According to studies, lower PLGF levels may be associated with the development of PE in compared with women with normal pregnancy [[15], [16], [17]]. By assessing the ratio of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1) to placental growth factor (PlGF) in pregnant women prior to clinical PE inferred that an sFlt-1:PlGF ratio of 38 or lower can be used to predict the temporary absence of PE in whom the condition is clinically suspected [18]. Low serum pregnancy associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A), which is a key regulator of insulin-like growth factor bioavailability and is essential for normal fetal development is associated with adverse pregnancy outcome, albeit with a poor predictive value [19]. Abnormal placental activity that characterizes PE is associated with increased vascular resistance in the placenta, and could be diagnosed by ultrasonographic evidence such as an increase in the pulsatility index (PI) of the uterine artery or persistent diastolic ‘notch’ in its Doppler waveform. The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) recently published practice guidelines on the role of ultrasound in the screening and follow-up of PE [20].

Damaged vascular endothelium and imbalances in the three major systems including the coagulation, anticoagulation, and fibrinolysis are currently thought to be related to the incidence of PE [18,21,22]. Several studies [[23], [24], [25]] have shown that coagulation-related indicators alter in PE-affected women, however conventional coagulation tests only provide data on a specific, discrete element of the coagulation process, which is insufficient for comprehending the entire coagulation process. By contrast, the Sonoclot coagulation analyzer can rapidly and conveniently monitor the entire coagulation process in a small amount of serum [5]. In this study, the traditional coagulation indexes and the measurable values of Sonoclot coagulation analyzer were recorded in two groups of mothers. The t-test was first performed to assess the concordance of the data between the two groups. The analyses suggested that patients who developed PE had significantly shorter PT and longer ACT. These findings are consistent with the patient being in a hypercoagulable state to maintain the integrity of the placenta. Persistent hypercoagulable state, secondary to overactivation of the fibrinolytic system, causes a prethrombotic state, which eventually develops into PE.

When all indicators of the study were included in a multivariate logistic regression with cross-validation, we observed a model accuracy (ACC) of 77.5% and a false positive rate of 16.4%. According to the 2019 screening guidelines of the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (IFOG), the combination of PlGF, PAPP-A, MAP, and UtPI is the most accurate predictor of PE [26]. In a large prospective study conducted by Akolekar R et al. at the U.K.’s Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF), the detection rate of PE in pregnant women was 96% when combined PAPP-A, PlGF, UtPI, and MAP was applied with a false positive rate of 10% [27]. An Asian multicenter prospective study reported that the combined early pregnancy multiplex screening approach had a 71.8% detection rate for PE with a false-positive rate of 15% [26]. A prospective Chinese multicenter study reported that the detection rate of PE by combined multiplex screening in early pregnancy was 72.6 % with a false-positive rate of 15% [28]. These studies along with our present findings underscore that Sonoclot is an useful guide for the early diagnosis of PE, and in combination with traditional coagulation-related indicators it can significantly improve the detection rate of PE.

In recent years, non-coding RNAs have attracted a lot of attention in PE research [[29], [30], [31]] even though these same non-coding RNAs were considered junk not very long ago [32]. In our patient population, we checked the expression of two specific lncRNAs, ANRIL and HOXD-AS1. The two lncRNAs were specifically chosen because of their demonstrated role in PE. ANRIL's role [33,34] as well as HOXD-AS1's role [35,36] in PE has been published before and our own results are in agreement with the earlier findings.

Despite all the promoses, our study also has some limitations including small sample size and a single-center study, which could somewhat affect the accuracy of the results.

Funding

This research was funded by the Project of Science and Technology Development Plan of Jilin Province (20190304116YY).

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Hongyu Shi: Writing – original draft, Formal analysis. Weijie Wang: Writing – review & editing, Data curation. Fan Li: Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis. Ao Guo: Validation, Methodology, Investigation. Tiecheng Liu: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Software, Resources, Conceptualization.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  • 1.Chappell L.C., Cluver C.A., Kingdom J., Tong S. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 2021;398(10297):341–354. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32335-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jim B., Karumanchi S.A. Preeclampsia: pathogenesis, prevention, and long-term complications. Semin. Nephrol. 2017;37(4):386–397. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2017.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.National Collaborating Centre for, W. s., & Children's, H. Hypertension in Pregnancy: the Management of Hypertensive Disorders during Pregnancy. RCOG Press, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; London: 2010. National Institute for Health and clinical excellence: guidance. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.O'Gorman N., Wright D., Poon L.C., Rolnik D.L., Syngelaki A., de Alvarado M., et al. Multicenter screening for pre-eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11-13 weeks' gestation: comparison with NICE guidelines and ACOG recommendations. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017;49(6):756–760. doi: 10.1002/uog.17455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.von Kaulla K.N., Ostendorf P., von Kaulla E. The impedance machine: a new bedside coagulation recording device. J. Med. 1975;6(1):73–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yamada T., Katori N., Tanaka K.A., Takeda J. Impact of Sonoclot hemostasis analysis after cardiopulmonary bypass on postoperative hemorrhage in cardiac surgery. J. Anesth. 2007;21(2):148–152. doi: 10.1007/s00540-006-0477-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yang W.X., Lai C.L., Chen F.H., Wang J.R., Ji Y.R., Wang D.X. The value of Sonoclot detection technology to guide the clinical medication of the perioperative anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing emergent PCI. Exp. Ther. Med. 2017;13(6):2917–2921. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rajkumar V., Kumar B., Dutta V., Mishra A.K., Puri G.D. Utility of sonoclot in prediction of postoperative bleeding in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery for congenital cyanotic heart disease: a prospective observational study. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2017;31(3):901–908. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Edanaga M., Hoshi T., Azumaguchi R., Yamakage M. A case of hemothorax due to traumatic bleeding managed effectively by Sonoclot®-guided blood transfusion. JA. Clin. Rep. 2016;2(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40981-016-0042-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.ElMonier A.A., El-Boghdady N.A., Fahim S.A., Sabry D., Elsetohy K.A., Shaheen A.A. LncRNA NEAT1 and MALAT1 are involved in polycystic ovary syndrome pathogenesis by functioning as competing endogenous RNAs to control the expression of PCOS-related target genes. Noncoding RNA Res. 2023;8(2):263–271. doi: 10.1016/j.ncrna.2023.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yang Y., Le Ray I., Zhu J., Zhang J., Hua J., Reilly M. Preeclampsia prevalence, risk factors, and pregnancy outcomes in Sweden and China. JAMA Netw. Open. 2021;4(5) doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hurrell A., Duhig K., Vandermolen B., Shennan A.H. Recent advances in the diagnosis and management of pre-eclampsia. Fac. Rev. 2020;9:10. doi: 10.12703/b/9-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Takahashi M., Makino S., Oguma K., Imai H., Takamizu A., Koizumi A., et al. Fetal growth restriction as the initial finding of preeclampsia is a clinical predictor of maternal and neonatal prognoses: a single-center retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):678. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04152-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mol B.W.J., Roberts C.T., Thangaratinam S., Magee L.A., de Groot C.J.M., Hofmeyr G.J. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 2016;387(10022):999–1011. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00070-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chappell L.C., Duckworth S., Seed P.T., Griffin M., Myers J., Mackillop L., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of placental growth factor in women with suspected preeclampsia: a prospective multicenter study. Circulation. 2013;128(19):2121–2131. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.113.003215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Parchem J.G., Brock C.O., Chen H.Y., Kalluri R., Barton J.R., Sibai B.M. Placental growth factor and the risk of adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020;135(3):665–673. doi: 10.1097/aog.0000000000003694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Barton J.R., Woelkers D.A., Newman R.B., Combs C.A., How H.Y., Boggess K.A., et al. Placental growth factor predicts time to delivery in women with signs or symptoms of early preterm preeclampsia: a prospective multicenter study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020;222(3) doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.003. 259.e251-259.e211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zeisler H., Llurba E., Chantraine F., Vatish M., Staff A.C., Sennström M., et al. Predictive value of the sFlt-1:PlGF ratio in women with suspected preeclampsia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;374(1):13–22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Morris R.K., Bilagi A., Devani P., Kilby M.D. Association of serum PAPP-A levels in first trimester with small for gestational age and adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Prenat. Diagn. 2017;37(3):253–265. doi: 10.1002/pd.5001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sotiriadis A., Hernandez-Andrade E., da Silva Costa F., Ghi T., Glanc P., Khalil A., et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in screening for and follow-up of pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2019;53(1):7–22. doi: 10.1002/uog.20105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 202: gestational hypertension and preeclampsia (2019). Obstet. Gynecol., 133(1), 1, doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000003018. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 22.Rahman R., Begum K., Khondker L., Majumder N.I., Nahar K., Sultana R., et al. Role of D-dimer in determining coagulability status in pre-eclamptic and normotensive pregnant women. Mymensingh Med. J. 2015;24(1):115–120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Linlin Y., Meihong C., Yanjia x.F. The application value of sFlt-1, PlGF and coagulation-fibrinolytic indicators in late pregnancy in the diagnosis of preeclampsia. Med . Theor. Pract. 2022;35(21):4. doi: 10.19381/j.issn.1001-7585.2022.21.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Liu Z., Zhang H., Chen L., Lin L., Yan J. Blood coagulation indices in twin pregnancy complicated with preeclampsia. J. Coll Phys. Surg Pak. 2020;30(3):276–281. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2020.03.276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shao H., Gao S., Dai D., Zhao X., Hua Y., Yu H. The association of antenatal D-dimer and fibrinogen with postpartum hemorrhage and intrauterine growth restriction in preeclampsia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):605. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04082-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Poon L.C., Shennan A., Hyett J.A., Kapur A., Hadar E., Divakar H., et al. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on pre-eclampsia: a pragmatic guide for first-trimester screening and prevention. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2019;145(Suppl 1):1–33. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12802. Suppl 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Akolekar R., Syngelaki A., Poon L., Wright D., Nicolaides K.H. Competing risks model in early screening for preeclampsia by biophysical and biochemical markers. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2013;33(1):8–15. doi: 10.1159/000341264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hu J., Gao J., Liu J., Meng H., Hao N., Song Y., et al. Prospective evaluation of first-trimester screening strategy for preterm pre-eclampsia and its clinical applicability in China. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2021;58(4):529–539. doi: 10.1002/uog.23645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Munjas J., Sopic M., Stefanovic A., Kosir R., Ninic A., Joksic I., et al. Non-coding RNAs in preeclampsia-molecular mechanisms and diagnostic potential. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22(19) doi: 10.3390/ijms221910652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Li N., Gu Y., Tang J., Li Y., Chen D., Xu Z. Circulating non-coding RNAs and exosomes: liquid biopsies for monitoring preeclampsia. Methods Mol. Biol. 2023;2695:263–277. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3346-5_18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jairajpuri D.S., Malalla Z.H., Sarray S., Mahmood N. Analysis of differential expression of hypoxia-inducible microRNA-210 gene targets in mild and severe preeclamptic patients. Noncoding RNA Res. 2021;6(1):51–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ncrna.2021.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ahmad A. Non-coding RNAs: a tale of junk turning into treasure. Noncoding RNA Res. 2016;1(1):1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.ncrna.2016.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ayoub S.E., Shaker O.G., Aboshama R.A., Etman M.K., Khalefa A.A., Khamiss Abd Elguaad M.M., et al. Expression profile of LncRNA ANRIL, miR-186, miR-181a, and MTMR-3 in patients with preeclampsia. Noncoding RNA Res. 2023;8(4):481–486. doi: 10.1016/j.ncrna.2023.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Asadi-Tarani M., Saravani M., Ghasemi M., Rezaei M., Salimi S. Maternal and placental ANRIL polymorphisms and preeclampsia susceptibility. Méd. 2023;20(5):445–452. doi: 10.2217/pme-2023-0073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang L., Shi L., Zhou B., Hong L., Gong H., Wu D. METTL3-mediated lncRNA HOXD-AS1 stability regulates inflammation, and the migration and invasion of trophoblast cells via the miR-135a/β-TRCP axis. Noncoding RNA Res. 2024;9(1):12–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ncrna.2023.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jiang J., Zhao Z.M. LncRNA HOXD-AS1 promotes preeclampsia progression via MAPK pathway. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018;22(24):8561–8568. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201812_16618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Non-coding RNA Research are provided here courtesy of KeAi Publishing

RESOURCES