Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 11;102:105047. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105047

Table 3.

Summary of the existing debias methods and the proposed method.

Method Implementation Does it require demographic information? Does it require re-training the model? Difficulty
Baseline Do not consider the demographic group differences.
Balanced21 Reduce the sample size of the majority group to achieve a balanced population for each group. Yes Yes The amount of data decreases.
Stratified21 Train separate models for each group. Yes Yes Minority groups may have insufficient data, resulting in a poorly trained model.
Adversarial54,56 Use an adversary to an adversary to decrease the model's capacity to identify demographic groups. Yes Yes Model-specific; determining the appropriate level of the adversary can be challenging.
DistMatch MMD57 Add a penalty to reduce the maximum mean discrepancy58 distance between groups Yes Yes The data imbalance between demographic groups, different data splits, and distance metrics during training may lead to instability in calculating the distance.
DistMatch Mean57 Add a penalty to reduce the mean of the distribution between groups.
FairALM59 Apply an augmented Lagrangian method to penalise the distribution discrepancy. Yes Yes Different assumptions regarding distribution can yield varying results.
Proposed augmentation Use image augmentation to prevent the model from learning shortcut based on demographic information No Noa Time-consuming when augmenting images
a

It is not necessary to re-train the model as the image augmentation can be applied during the test phase.